Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;2(1):8-18.
doi: 10.7774/cevr.2013.2.1.8. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

Requirements for improved vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease epidemics

Affiliations

Requirements for improved vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease epidemics

Jong-Hyeon Park. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Inactivated foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines are currently used worldwide. With the emergence of various FMD virus serotypes and subtypes, vaccines must become more suitable for field-based uses under the current circumstances in terms of the fast and proper selection of vaccine strains, an extended vaccine development period for new viruses, protecting against the risk of virus leakage during vaccine manufacture, counteracting the delayed onset of immune response, counteracting shorter durations of immunity, and the accurate serological differentiation of infected and vaccinated animals and multiple vaccination. The quality of vaccines should then be improved to effectively control FMD outbreaks and minimize the problems that can arise among livestock after vaccinations. Vaccine improvement should be based on using attenuated virus strains with high levels of safety. Moreover, when vaccines are urgently required for newly spread field strains, the seed viruses for new vaccines should be developed for only a short period. Improved vaccines should offer superior immunization to all susceptible animals including cattle and swine. In addition, they should have highly protective effects without persistent infection. In this way, if vaccines are developed using new methods such as reverse genetics or vector vaccine technology, in which live viruses can be easily made by replacing specific protective antigens, even a single vaccination is likely to generate highly protective effects with an extended duration of immunity, and the safety and stability of the vaccines will be assured. We therefore reviewed the current FMD vaccines and their adjuvants, and evaluated if they provide superior immunization to all susceptible animals including cattle and swine.

Keywords: Development; Foot-and-mouth disease; Improvement; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Antibody levels against the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus O type in susceptible animals after FMD vaccination in the field without maternal-derived antibody during the 2010 to 2011 epidemic in Korea. (A) Antibody levels determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to viral structural proteins (SP-ELISA) after the first vaccination (or second vaccination). The second vaccination in case of pigs (tested 30-50 animals per week) were vaccinated 4 weeks after first vaccination. (B) Virus neutralizing (VN) reciprocal titers using the field strain (O/Andong/KOR/2010) two weeks after the second vaccination.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diminishment of the foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks after vaccination during the 2010 to 2011 epidemic in Korea. The arrows show the onset of vaccination.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bachrach HL. Foot-and-mouth disease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1968;22:201–244. - PubMed
    1. Hedger RS, Taylor WP, Barnett IT, Riek R, Harpham D. Simultaneous vaccination of cattle against foot-and-mouth disease and rinderpest. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1986;18:21–25. - PubMed
    1. Yoon H, Yoon SS, Wee SH, Kim YJ, Kim B. Clinical manifestations of foot-and-mouth disease during the 2010/2011 epidemic in the Republic of Korea. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2012;59:517–525. - PubMed
    1. Dupuis L, Ascarateil S, Aucouturier J, Ganne V. SEPPIC vaccine adjuvants for poultry. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1081:202–205. - PubMed
    1. Cloete M, Dungu B, Van Staden LI, Ismail-Cassim N, Vosloo W. Evaluation of different adjuvants for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine containing all the SAT serotypes. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2008;75:17–31. - PubMed