Requirements for improved vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease epidemics
- PMID: 23596585
- PMCID: PMC3623506
- DOI: 10.7774/cevr.2013.2.1.8
Requirements for improved vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease epidemics
Abstract
Inactivated foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines are currently used worldwide. With the emergence of various FMD virus serotypes and subtypes, vaccines must become more suitable for field-based uses under the current circumstances in terms of the fast and proper selection of vaccine strains, an extended vaccine development period for new viruses, protecting against the risk of virus leakage during vaccine manufacture, counteracting the delayed onset of immune response, counteracting shorter durations of immunity, and the accurate serological differentiation of infected and vaccinated animals and multiple vaccination. The quality of vaccines should then be improved to effectively control FMD outbreaks and minimize the problems that can arise among livestock after vaccinations. Vaccine improvement should be based on using attenuated virus strains with high levels of safety. Moreover, when vaccines are urgently required for newly spread field strains, the seed viruses for new vaccines should be developed for only a short period. Improved vaccines should offer superior immunization to all susceptible animals including cattle and swine. In addition, they should have highly protective effects without persistent infection. In this way, if vaccines are developed using new methods such as reverse genetics or vector vaccine technology, in which live viruses can be easily made by replacing specific protective antigens, even a single vaccination is likely to generate highly protective effects with an extended duration of immunity, and the safety and stability of the vaccines will be assured. We therefore reviewed the current FMD vaccines and their adjuvants, and evaluated if they provide superior immunization to all susceptible animals including cattle and swine.
Keywords: Development; Foot-and-mouth disease; Improvement; Vaccine.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Evaluation of modified Vaccinia Ankara-based vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease serotype A24 in cattle.Vaccine. 2020 Jan 22;38(4):769-778. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.103. Epub 2019 Nov 9. Vaccine. 2020. PMID: 31718901
-
Evaluation of novel inactivated vaccines for the SAT 1, SAT 2 and SAT 3 serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease in pigs.Virol J. 2019 Dec 16;16(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12985-019-1262-1. Virol J. 2019. PMID: 31842907 Free PMC article.
-
Recombinant human adenovirus-5 expressing capsid proteins of Indian vaccine strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus elicits effective antibody response in cattle.Vet Microbiol. 2017 May;203:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Mar 18. Vet Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28619144
-
Global Foot-and-Mouth Disease Research Update and Gap Analysis: 3 - Vaccines.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016 Jun;63 Suppl 1:30-41. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12521. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016. PMID: 27320164 Review.
-
Developing Vaccines Against Foot-and-Mouth Disease: a Biotechnological Approach.Arch Razi Inst. 2018 Dec;73(1):1-10. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2018.114054. Epub 2017 May 15. Arch Razi Inst. 2018. PMID: 30256033 Review.
Cited by
-
The co-injection of antioxidants with foot-and-mouth disease vaccination altered growth performance and blood parameters of finishing Holstein steers.Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019 Jun;32(6):792-799. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0609. Epub 2018 Oct 29. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019. PMID: 30381733 Free PMC article.
-
Expression of intracellular interferon-alpha confers antiviral properties in transfected bovine fetal fibroblasts and does not affect the full development of SCNT embryos.PLoS One. 2014 Jul 8;9(7):e94444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094444. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25004008 Free PMC article.
-
Recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein carrying a foot-and-mouth disease virus epitope as a vaccine candidate.J Vet Med Sci. 2020 Aug 28;82(8):1155-1159. doi: 10.1292/jvms.19-0559. Epub 2020 Jul 23. J Vet Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32581148 Free PMC article.
-
Advancements in antiviral approaches against foot-and-mouth disease virus: a comprehensive review.Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 16;12:1574193. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1574193. eCollection 2025. Front Vet Sci. 2025. PMID: 40740301 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the efficacy of a new oil-based adjuvant ISA 61 VG FMD vaccine as a potential vaccine for cattle.Iran J Vet Res. 2016 Winter;17(1):8-12. Iran J Vet Res. 2016. PMID: 27656222 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bachrach HL. Foot-and-mouth disease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1968;22:201–244. - PubMed
-
- Hedger RS, Taylor WP, Barnett IT, Riek R, Harpham D. Simultaneous vaccination of cattle against foot-and-mouth disease and rinderpest. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1986;18:21–25. - PubMed
-
- Yoon H, Yoon SS, Wee SH, Kim YJ, Kim B. Clinical manifestations of foot-and-mouth disease during the 2010/2011 epidemic in the Republic of Korea. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2012;59:517–525. - PubMed
-
- Dupuis L, Ascarateil S, Aucouturier J, Ganne V. SEPPIC vaccine adjuvants for poultry. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1081:202–205. - PubMed
-
- Cloete M, Dungu B, Van Staden LI, Ismail-Cassim N, Vosloo W. Evaluation of different adjuvants for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine containing all the SAT serotypes. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2008;75:17–31. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources