The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time
- PMID: 23597377
- PMCID: PMC3698732
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301299
The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time
Abstract
We provided a synthesis of use, summarized key issues in applying, and highlighted exemplary applications in the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. We articulated key RE-AIM criteria by reviewing the published literature from 1999 to 2010 in several databases to describe the application and reporting on various RE-AIM dimensions. After excluding nonempirical articles, case studies, and commentaries, 71 articles were identified. The most frequent publications were on physical activity, obesity, and disease management. Four articles reported solely on 1 dimension compared with 44 articles that reported on all 5 dimensions of the framework. RE-AIM was broadly applied, but several criteria were not reported consistently.
Figures


References
-
- Zerhouni EA. Clinical research at a crossroads: the NIH roadmap. J Investig Med. 2006;54(4):171–173 - PubMed
-
- Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006;29(1):126–153 - PubMed
-
- McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–377 - PubMed
-
- Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Program and Planning: An Educational and Ecolgocial Approach. 4th ed New York, NY: McGraw Hill Higher Education; 2005
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical