Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;103(6):e54-60.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301213. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

The impact of cigarette excise tax increases on purchasing behaviors among New York city smokers

Affiliations

The impact of cigarette excise tax increases on purchasing behaviors among New York city smokers

Micaela H Coady et al. Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: We examined the relationship between cigarette excise tax increases and tax-avoidant purchasing behaviors among New York City adult smokers.

Methods: We analyzed data from the city's annual Community Health Survey to assess changes in rates of tax avoidance over time (2003-2010) and smokers' responses to the 2008 state cigarette tax increase. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified correlates of buying more cigarettes on the street in response to the increase.

Results: After the 2002 tax increase, the percentage of smokers engaged in tax-avoidant behavior decreased with time from 30% in 2003 to 13% in 2007. Following the 2008 tax increase, 21% of smokers reported buying more cigarettes from another person on the street. Low-income, younger, Black, and Hispanic smokers were more likely than respondents with other sociodemographic characteristics to purchase more cigarettes on the street.

Conclusions: To maximize public health impact, cigarette tax increases should be paired with efforts to limit the flow of untaxed cigarettes entering jurisdictions with high cigarette pack prices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Tax-avoidant cigarette purchases among adult smokers: New York City, 2003–2010. Note. NYC = New York City; NYS = New York State. The following estimates should be interpreted with caution: Indian reservation (2005, 2007), Internet/mail (2006–2010), outside United States/duty-free (2007–2010). The relative SE was > 30% or the sample size was < 50, making these estimates potentially unreliable. aDenotes cigarette excise tax increases: NYS in 2008, federal in 2009, and NYS in 2010.

References

    1. Chaloupka FJ, Tauras JA. The power of tax and price. Tob Control. 2011;20(6):391–392 - PubMed
    1. Chaloupka FJ, Straif K, Leon MEWorking Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer Effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control. Tob Control. 2011;20(3):235–238 - PubMed
    1. Dinno A, Glantz S. Tobacco control policies are egalitarian: a vulnerabilities perspective on clean indoor air laws, cigarette prices, and tobacco use disparities. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(8):1439–1447 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gallus S, Schiaffina A, La Vecchia C, Townsend J, Fernandez E. Price and cigarette consumption in Europe. Tob Control. 2006;15(2):114–119 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franz GA. Price effects on the smoking behaviour of adult age groups. Public Health. 2008;122(12):1343–1348 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources