Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;8(6):365-70.
doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000646. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials

Affiliations

Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials

Lynne T Penberthy et al. J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Determining eligibility for a clinical trial (CT) typically requires a lengthy manual review of data for a single evaluation. The cost associated with eligibility screening is typically not compensated through contracts supporting CTs.

Methods: We used a real-time tracking system that captures CT evaluations and provides information on evaluation outcomes and time spent on each eligibility screening by research staff. Using these data, we describe the effort and costs of eligibility screening overall and per enrolled patient for cancer CTs. The study sample included all completed eligibility assessment (evaluation) records for the 18-month study period. We used generalized multinomial modeling to predict evaluation outcomes and then used the resulting parameter coefficients to estimate the effort associated with each participant, adjusted for probability of being enrolled. From these data, we calculated cost associated with eligibility screening.

Results: We found substantial variation in attributed cost by study type and phase. The cost of eligibility screening ranged by study phase from $129.15 to $336.48 per enrolled patient. The estimated annual cost of screening was more than $90,000.

Conclusion: This study provides results based on prospectively captured effort to estimate the largely nonreimbursed costs of eligibility screening and suggests that screening can be a significant financial burden to an institution. Centers performing CTs may need to acknowledge the differences in screening costs for different study types when negotiating contracts with funding organizations. Information such as that captured here could support such negotiations to reduce the gap between reimbursed and nonreimbursed costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ellis PM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH, et al. Randomized clinical trials in oncology: Understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3554–3561. - PubMed
    1. Ford JG, Howerton MW, Lai GY, et al. Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: A systematic review. Cancer. 2008;112:228–242. - PubMed
    1. Lara PN, Jr, Higdon R, Lim N, et al. Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: Identifying potential barriers to enrollment. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1728–1733. - PubMed
    1. Stewart JH, Bertoni AG, Staten JL, et al. Participation in surgical oncology clinical trials: Gender-, race/ethnicity-, and age-based disparities. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3328–3334. - PubMed
    1. Virani S, Burke L, Remick SC, et al. Barriers to recruitment of rural patients in cancer clinical trials. J Oncol Pract. 2011;7:172–177. - PMC - PubMed