Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Aug;91(5):e397-405.
doi: 10.1111/aos.12131. Epub 2013 Apr 20.

Conjunctival goblet cells density and preservative-free tafluprost therapy for glaucoma: an in vivo confocal microscopy and impression cytology study

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Conjunctival goblet cells density and preservative-free tafluprost therapy for glaucoma: an in vivo confocal microscopy and impression cytology study

Leonardo Mastropasqua et al. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the density of conjunctival goblet cells (GCs) in glaucomatous patients treated with preservative-free (PF) tafluprost, using laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) and impression cytology (IC).

Methods: Thirty glaucomatous patients (30 eyes) naive for therapy and thirty healthy subjects (30 eyes) were enrolled. Conjunctiva was examined by means of Heidelberg Retina Tomography/Rostock cornea module. Afterwards, the specimens for IC were obtained. Patients were randomized to PF-tafluprost (Group 1) or preserved latanoprost (Group 2) and controls to the vehicle of latanoprost (Group 3) or physiological buffered saline solution (Group 4). Both LSCM and IC were performed at baseline, and after the 1st and 6th months of therapy, GC density (GCD) (cells/mm(2) ) was the main outcome measurement.

Results: Baseline. Mean GCD was 240.69 ± 25.43 and 232.65 ± 23.52, for LSCM, and 162.10 ± 23.44 and 164.71 ± 21.03 for IC in Group 1 and 2, respectively. GC density values were not significantly different in Group 3 and 4 (p > 0.05%). Month one. Mean GCD increased to 284.16 ± 43.88 and 230.62 ± 48.32 in Group 1 (p < 0.001) and to 297.86 ± 26.87 and 221.78 ± 43.02 in Group 2 (p < 0.05), measured with LSCM and IC, respectively. In Group 3, GCD decreased to 205.88 ± 25.04 and 139.54 ± 17.37 measured with LSCM and IC, respectively (p < 0.05). Month six. Mean GCD did not change in Group 1 (p > 0.05) whereas it decreased in Group 2 (p < 0.05), compared to month 1. In Group 3, GCD further decreased to 166.32 ± 22.31 and 120.76 ± 11.66, measured with LSCM and IC, respectively (p < 0.05); in Group 4, mean GCD did not change during the study period (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Treatment with PF tafluprost was associated with an increase in conjunctival GCD in glaucomatous eyes naïve for therapy. Further studies are mandatory to verify this finding because its validation may have important consequences in the medical management of glaucoma.

Keywords: conjunctival goblet cells; impression cytology and primary open angle glaucoma; in vivo confocal microscopy; preservative-free tafluprost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources