Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 20:6:158.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-158.

Feasibility of aortic valve assessment with low dose prospectively triggered adaptive systolic (PTAS) cardiac computed tomography angiography

Feasibility of aortic valve assessment with low dose prospectively triggered adaptive systolic (PTAS) cardiac computed tomography angiography

Ashley M Lee et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) is feasible for aortic valve evaluation, but retrospective gated protocols required high radiation doses for aortic valve assessment. A prospectively triggered adaptive systolic (PTAS) cardiac CT protocol was recently described in arrhythmia using second-generation dual-source CT. In this study, we sought to evaluate the feasibility of PTAS CTA to assess the aortic valve at a low radiation dose.

Findings: A retrospective cohort of 29 consecutive patients whom underwent PTAS protocols for clinical indications other than aortic valve assessment and whom also received echocardiography within 2 months of CT, was identified. Images were reviewed for aortic valve morphology (tricuspid/bicuspid/prosthetic) and stenosis (AS) by experienced blinded readers. Accuracy versus echocardiography and radiation doses were assessed.

Conclusions: PTAS CTA protocols using second-generation dual-source CT for aortic valve evaluation are feasible at low doses. This protocol should be investigated further in larger cohorts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ECG strip demonstrating timing of image acquisition. PTAS CTA is shown with radiation exposure peak at 100% of the reference tube current (red arrow, “Range” settings) at 300–400 msec and a “plateau” (green arrow, “Scan” settings) with 20% of the reference tube current to capture additional phases at mid and late systole/early diastole.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bicuspid aortic valve. The cine clip (Additional file 1) shows the open valve (A, C) at 250 mm and closed valve (B, D) at 400 msec. Curved MPR of the normal LAD without stenosis (E).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of PTAS CTA in aortic valve evaluation. A: Reconstructions at 250 msec (top row) and 400 msec (bottom row) show the aortic valve in open and closed positions. There is mild restriction of the non-coronary cusp opening (arrows). B: Planimetry shows mild aortic stenosis. No motion artifacts were seen in the coronary arteries (not shown).

References

    1. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A, Bettex D, Baumert B, Leschka S, Desbiolles LM, Marincek B, Boehm T. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology. 2006;240:47–55. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2393050458. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J, Schachner T, Velik-Salchner C, Pachinger O, Dichtl W. Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:197–203. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2069. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen JJ-S, Jeudy J, Thorn EM, White CS. Computed tomography assessment of valvular morphology, function, and disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:S47–S56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2008.10.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen JJ, Manning MA, Frazier AA, Jeudy J, White CS. CT angiography of the cardiac valves: normal, diseased, and postoperative appearances. RadioGraphics. 2009;29:1393–1412. doi: 10.1148/rg.295095002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tanaka H, Shimada K, Yoshida K, Jissho S, Yoshikawa J, Yoshiyama M. The simultaneous assessment of aortic valve area and coronary artery stenosis using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis comparison with echocardiography. Circ J. 2007;71:1593–1598. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1593. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources