[Differences in the measurement results of Goldmann applanation tonometry with and without fluorescein]
- PMID: 23604252
- DOI: 10.1007/s00347-013-2843-9
[Differences in the measurement results of Goldmann applanation tonometry with and without fluorescein]
Abstract
Background: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is still the gold standard for measuring the intraocular pressure (IOP). Usually fluorescein eye drops are used additional to topical anesthesia to gain the best visualization results. The present study evaluated the differences in the results of GAT with and without fluorescein.
Methods: A total of 400 eyes of 200 patients without known glaucoma were enrolled in this study and randomized to two groups: group A (first measurement without, second measurement with fluorescein) and group B (first measurement with fluorescein, second without). All measurements were performed by the same examiner with the same slit lamp. Results were analyzed by Bland-Altman plots and Spearman's correlation test.
Results: The examined groups showed no significant differences regarding patient age, astigmatism or reason for consulting. In both groups performing GAT without the application of fluorescein led to significantly lower measurement results. The differences were 1.5 ± 1.7 mmHg SD in group A, 1.2 ± 1.6 mmHg SD in group B and 1.4 ± 1.65 mmHg SD for all eyes. The intraocular pressure (IOP) and the differences between the groups were independent of patient age, astigmatism, reason of consulting or IOP level. Both groups showed outliers up to 10 mmHg difference because of corneal edema.
Conclusions: Measurements from GAT without fluorescein differed significantly from measurements with fluorescein, independently of patient age, astigmatism, reason for consulting or IOP level. The mean difference of 1.4 mmHg may seem negligible in daily routine but can lead to serious consequences in borderline cases.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the Proview pressure phosphene tonometer performed by the patient and examiner with the Goldmann applanation tonometer.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;32(1):29-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2004.00753.x. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004. PMID: 14746587
-
[Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006 Oct;223(10):813-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-926862. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006. PMID: 17063423 German.
-
Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;68(4):620-626. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_570_19. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32174582 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective Comparative Analysis of 4 Different Intraocular Pressure Measurement Techniques and Their Effects on Pressure Readings.J Glaucoma. 2016 Oct;25(10):e897-e904. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000403. J Glaucoma. 2016. PMID: 26918913
-
Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;39(11):2517-2521. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01098-5. Epub 2019 Apr 9. Int Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30968328
Cited by
-
A comparison of NCT, Goldman application tonometry values with and without fluorescein.Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 29;12:2183-2188. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S177870. eCollection 2018. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 30464378 Free PMC article.
-
[Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard].Ophthalmologe. 2015 Sep;112(9):770-7. doi: 10.1007/s00347-014-3188-8. Ophthalmologe. 2015. PMID: 25501931 German.
-
Association of Diabetes With Central Corneal Thickness Among a Multiethnic Asian Population.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186647. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6647. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 30646192 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Goldman Applanation Tonometry with and without fluorescein among glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous patients attending Mzuzu Central Hospital in Malawi: A cross-sectional study.Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 1;6(7):e1390. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1390. eCollection 2023 Jul. Health Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37404454 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation between corneal and contact lens deformation with changes in intraocular pressure for wearable monitoring systems.Eye (Lond). 2023 Jul;37(10):2055-2060. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02285-y. Epub 2022 Oct 27. Eye (Lond). 2023. PMID: 36302975 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources