Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Apr;19(2):403-10.
doi: 10.1007/s10147-013-0561-6. Epub 2013 Apr 20.

Risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw in cancer patients receiving denosumab: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw in cancer patients receiving denosumab: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials

Wei-Xiang Qi et al. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to gain a better understanding of the overall incidence and risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in cancer patients receiving denosumab.

Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials identified in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Abstracts presented at the conferences were also searched. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials.

Results: A total of 8963 patients with a variety of solid tumors from 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included for the meta-analysis. The overall incidence of ONJ in cancer patients receiving denosumab was 1.7 % [95 % CI: 0.9-3.1 %]. Also, the use of denosumab was associated with significantly increased risk of ONJ in comparison with bisphosphonates (BPs)/placebo treatment (RR 1.61, 95 % CI: 1.05-2.48, P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis based on controlled therapies demonstrated an increased risk of ONJ in denosumab therapy, when compared with BPs (RR 1.48, 95 % CI: 0.96-2.29, P = 0.078) or placebo (RR 16.28, 95 % CI: 1.68-158.05, P = 0.017). Similar results were observed in prostate cancer (RR 3.358, 95 % CI: 1.573-7.166, P = 0.002) while there was a non-significantly increased risk of denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (DONJ) in non-prostate cancers (RR 1.142, 95 % CI: 0.678-1.921, P = 0.618).

Conclusions: The use of denosumab is associated with an increased risk of developing ONJ when compared with BP treatment or placebo, although the increased risk was not statistically significant between denosumab and BP treatment. Further studies are still needed to establish guidelines for the prevention and effective treatment of ONJ.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 2;94(19):1458-68 - PubMed
    1. Lung Cancer. 2010 Jan;67(1):4-11 - PubMed
    1. Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101 - PubMed
    1. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 May;16(3):450-2 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55637 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources