Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Aug;173(2):365-71.
doi: 10.1111/cei.12099.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (16 or 20%) therapy in obese patients with primary immunodeficiency: a retrospective analysis of administration by infusion pump or subcutaneous rapid push

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (16 or 20%) therapy in obese patients with primary immunodeficiency: a retrospective analysis of administration by infusion pump or subcutaneous rapid push

R Shapiro. Clin Exp Immunol. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single centre, capturing data on 173 primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) patients, including 40 obese patients, using subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin (Ig) (SCIG) (16 or 20%) delivered by infusion pump or subcutaneous (s.c.) rapid push. Patients previously using Ig administered as intravenous (i.v.) infusions (IVIG) were converted to SCIG dosing on a 1:1 basis. In both obese and non-obese patients, mean serum Ig levels were higher during SCIG administration (steady state) compared with IVIG administration (trough values). Similar SCIG dose : serum IgG level relationships were observed between obese and non-obese patients, suggesting the consistent bioavailability of SCIG regardless of body mass index (BMI). The mean SCIG volume per dosing site and the mean number of dosing days per week were greater with s.c. rapid push compared with infusion pump in this cohort, but the mean number of sites per infusion session was lower with s.c. rapid push. Both methods were well tolerated. The use of 20 versus 16% SCIG in obese patients improved dosing efficiency, resulting in smaller weekly volumes (54·7 versus 74·5 ml/week) and dosing on fewer days per week (2·3 versus 3·4 days). These data do not suggest a need for SCIG dosing adjustments in obese individuals relative to non-obese patients. The administration of SCIG using either infusion pump or s.c. rapid push is a practical and well-tolerated alternative to IVIG in obese patients. Offering various administration techniques provides a greater opportunity for treatment satisfaction and patient empowerment, which may support high levels of patient compliance.

Keywords: Hizentra; Vivaglobin; obesity; primary immunodeficiency disease; subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparative immunoglobulin (Ig) dosing (a) and serum IgG findings (b) reflective of intravenous Ig (IVIG) and subcutaneous Ig (SCIG) use in patients with body mass index (BMI) < 30 and 30+. N: number of unique patients represented; V: number of visits with relevant data; s.d.: standard deviation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time spent for subcutaneous (s.c.) rapid push infusion among obese patients [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30]. Data are presented as the percentage of visits reporting administration times (in min) within each category. For comparison, all estimated infusion durations with pump administration were ≥ 30 min, regardless of s.c. immunoglobulin (SCIG) concentration (median, 60 min duration with both 16 and 20% SCIG).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scatterplots illustrating serum immunoglobulin (IgG) responses according to monthly subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) doses for patients with body mass index (BMI) values < 30 and ≥ 30. Regression analysis confirmed no evidence of a relationship between serum IgG and BMI (P = 0·5379).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berger M, Rojavin M, Kiessling P, Zenker O. Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous immunoglobulin and their use in dosing of replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Clin Immunol. 2011;139:133–141. - PubMed
    1. Berger M. Subcutaneous administration of IgG. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2008;28:779–802. - PubMed
    1. Chapel HM, Spickett GP, Ericson D, Engl W, Eibl MM, Bjorkander J. The comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravenous versus subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy. J Clin Immunol. 2000;20:94–100. - PubMed
    1. Ochs HD, Gupta S, Kiessling P, Nicolay U, Berger M. Safety and efficacy of self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. J Clin Immunol. 2006;26:265–273. - PubMed
    1. Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Asensio O, et al. Rapid subcutaneous IgG replacement therapy is effective and safe in children and adults with primary immunodeficiencies – a prospective, multi-national study. J Clin Immunol. 2006;26:177–185. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances