Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;30(8):1956-67.
doi: 10.1007/s11095-013-1039-y. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

Polydopamine-based surface modification for the development of peritumorally activatable nanoparticles

Affiliations

Polydopamine-based surface modification for the development of peritumorally activatable nanoparticles

Emily Gullotti et al. Pharm Res. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To create poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs), where a drug-encapsulating NP core is covered with polyethylene glycol (PEG) in a normal condition but exposes a cell-interactive TAT-modified surface in an environment rich in matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs).

Methods: PLGA NPs were modified with TAT peptide (PLGA-pDA-TAT NPs) or dual-modified with TAT peptide and a conjugate of PEG and MMP-substrate peptide (peritumorally activatable NPs, PANPs) via dopamine polymerization. Cellular uptake of fluorescently labeled NPs was observed with or without a pre-treatment of MMP-2 by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. NPs loaded with paclitaxel (PTX) were tested against SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cells to evaluate the contribution of surface modification to cellular delivery of PTX.

Results: While the size and morphology did not significantly change due to the modification, NPs modified with dopamine polymerization were recognized by their dark color. TAT-containing NPs (PLGA-pDA-TAT NPs and PANPs) showed changes in surface charge, indicative of effective conjugation of TAT peptide on the surface. PLGA-pDA-TAT NPs and MMP-2-pre-treated PANPs showed relatively good cellular uptake compared to PLGA NPs, MMP-2-non-treated PANPs, and NPs with non-cleavable PEG. After 3 h treatment with cells, PTX loaded in cell-interactive NPs showed greater toxicity than non-interactive ones as the former could enter cells during the incubation period. However, due to the initial burst drug release, the difference was not as clear as microscopic observation.

Conclusions: PEGylated polymeric NPs that could expose cell-interactive surface in response to MMP-2 were successfully created by dual modification of PLGA NPs using dopamine polymerization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic diagram of a peritumorally activatable nanoparticle (PANP).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram of preparation of NPs used in this study.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scanning electron micrographs of PLGA, PLGA-pDA, and PLGA-pDA-TAT NPs.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Drug release kinetics from PTX/PLGA NPs, PTX/PLGA-pDA-TAT NPs, PTX/PLGA-PEG NPs, and PTX/PANPs. Each data point represents an average and standard deviation of at least 3 identically and independently prepared samples (ANOVA, Tukey test means comparison, p<0.05).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Cellular uptake of *PLGA, *PLGA-pDA, and *PLGA-pDA-TAT NPs. NPs were added to SKOV-3 cells in culture medium supplemented with 10% FBS. NP: green fluorescence signal from NPs; Nu: nuclei stained with Draq5; Tm: transmission image; Overlay: overlay of NP, Nu and Tm. Magnification: 600×. Scale bar = 40 μm.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
(A) A representative flow cytometry overlay histogram showing fluorescence intensity of SKOV-3 cells treated with *PLGA, *PLGA-pDA, and *PLGA-pDA-TAT NPs. (B) Geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMFI) of SKOV-3 cells treated with *PLGA, *PLGA-pDA, and *PLGA-pDA-TAT NPs. Data are expressed averages and standard deviations of 3 tests performed with identically and independently prepared samples. *: p<0.05 by Tukey test means comparison (difference from control was not indicated).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Viability of SKOV-3 cells treated with PTX/PLGA NPs or PLGA/PLGA-pDA-TAT NPs. Data are expressed as averages with standard deviations of 3 identically and independently prepared samples. (For IC50 calculation, see Supporting Table).
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Cellular uptake of *PANPs and *PLGA-PEG NPs with or without MMP-2 pre-treatment. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
A representative flow cytometry overlay histograms showing fluorescence intensity of SKOV-3 cells treated with *PLGA-PEG and *PANP NPs. (A) Without MMP-2 treatment and (B) with MMP-2 treatment. (C) Geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMFI) of SKOV-3 cells treated with *PLGA-PEG and *PANP NPs. Data are expressed averages and standard deviations of 3 tests performed with identically and independently prepared samples. *: p<0.05 by one-tailed t-test.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Viability of SKOV-3 cells treated with PTX/PANPs or PTX/PLGA-PEG NPs with or without MMP-2 pre-treatment. Data are expressed as averages with standard deviations of 3 identically and independently prepared samples. *: p<0.05 by Tukey test means comparison.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Matsumura Y, Maeda H. A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: Mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res. 1986;46(12):6387–92. - PubMed
    1. Gabizon AA, Shmeeda H, Zalipsky S. Pros and cons of the liposome platform in cancer drug targeting. J Liposome Res. 2006;16(3):175–83. - PubMed
    1. Yokoyama M. Drug targeting with nano-sized carrier systems. J Artif Organs. 2005;8(2):77–84. - PubMed
    1. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2(12):751–60. - PubMed
    1. Wang M, Thanou M. Targeting nanoparticles to cancer. Pharmacol Res. 62(2):90–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms