Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;43(3):188-92.
doi: 10.5915/43-3-8972.

Ethical dilemmas in decision making at limits of neonatal viability

Affiliations

Ethical dilemmas in decision making at limits of neonatal viability

Ali M Nadroo. J IMA. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

The survival rate for extremely preterm infants has improved over the last two decades. Although the incidence of such births is about 2%, the impact of preterm birth on these infants, their families, health-care providers, and society is profound. The birth of an extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and early gestational age infant poses complex medical, social, and ethical challenges to the family and health-care professionals. Survivors have an increased risk of chronic medical problems and disability. It is difficult to make decisions while trying to provide optimal medical care to the infant and supporting the family when delivery occurs at the threshold of viability because outcome at that time is highly unpredictable. Such decisions may have lifelong consequences for those involved. An individualized prognostic strategy appears to be the most appropriate approach. While keeping the patient's best interest as the primary objective, the goal is to reach, through a process of effective communication between the parents and physicians, a consensual decision that respects the parents' wishes and promotes physician beneficence.

Keywords: ethics; live birth; low-birth weight; preterm birth; viability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roth J, Resnick MB, Ariet M, et al. Changes in survival patterns of very low-birth-weight infants from 1980 to 1993. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:1311–7. http://doi.org/hgd. - PubMed
    1. Doyle LW, Davis P, Dharmaligam A, et al. Assisted ventilation and survival of extremely low birth-weight infants. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 1996;32:138–142. http://doi.org/bdskwp. - PubMed
    1. Ho LY. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability –from principles to practice. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2003;32:362–75. PubMed. - PubMed
    1. Partridge JC, Ranchod TM, Ballot DE, et al. Intensive care for very low birthweight infants in South Africa: a survey of physician attitudes, parent counseling and resuscitation practices. J Trop Pediatr. 2005;51:11–6. http://doi.org/bqmv68. - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

LinkOut - more resources