Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 1;1(5):71-7.
doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.15.2000065. Print 2012 May.

Minimal clinically important differences in health-related quality of life after total hip or knee replacement: A systematic review

Affiliations

Minimal clinically important differences in health-related quality of life after total hip or knee replacement: A systematic review

J C Keurentjes et al. Bone Joint Res. .

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed first to summarise minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) after total hip (THR) or knee replacement (TKR) in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Secondly, we aimed to improve the precision of MCID estimates by means of meta-analysis.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of English and non-English articles using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1960-2011), EMBASE (1991-2011), Web of Science, Academic Search Premier and Science Direct. Bibliographies of included studies were searched in order to find additional studies. Search terms included MCID or minimal clinically important change, THR or TKR and Short-Form 36. We included longitudinal studies that estimated MCID of SF-36 after THR or TKR.

Results: THREE STUDIES MET OUR INCLUSION CRITERIA, DESCRIBING A DISTINCT STUDY POPULATION: primary THR, primary TKR and revision THR. No synthesis of study results can be given.

Conclusions: Although we found MCIDs in HRQoL after THR or TKR have limited precision and are not validated using external criteria, these are still the best known estimates of MCIDs in HRQoL after THR and TKR to date. We therefore advise these MCIDs to be used as absolute thresholds, but with caution.

Keywords: Health-related quality of life; Minimal clinically important differences; SF-36; Systematic review; Total hip replacement; Total knee replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE Conflict of Interest:None declared

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow-chart of study inclusion (THR, total hip replacement; TKR, total knee replacement; MCID, minimal clinically important difference).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Graph showing the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in the domains of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) at six months after primary total hip (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) and revision THR. The size of the coloured circles represents the sample sizes used to estimate the MCID, and the error bars denote the 95% confidence intervals (PF, physical functioning; RP, role physical; BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; VT, vitality; SF, social functioning; RE, role emotional; MH, mental health).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Graph showing the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in the domains of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) at two years after primary total hip (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR). The size of the coloured circles represents the sample sizes used to estimate the MCID, and the error bars denote the 95% confidence intervals (PF, physical functioning; RP, role physical; BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; VT, vitality; SF, social functioning; RE, role emotional; MH, mental health).

References

    1. Harris WH, Sledge CB. Total hip and total knee replacement (1). N Engl J Med 1990;323:725–731 - PubMed
    1. Singh J, Sloan JA, Johanson NA. Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010;18:72–82 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407–415 - PubMed
    1. King MT. A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011;11:171–184 - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR; Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:371–383 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources