Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct;52(10):1748-53.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket154. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

New classification criteria for gout: a framework for progress

Nicola Dalbeth  1 , Jaap Fransen, Tim L Jansen, Tuhina Neogi, H Ralph Schumacher, William J Taylor
Affiliations
Review

New classification criteria for gout: a framework for progress

Nicola Dalbeth et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Oct.

Abstract

The definitive classification or diagnosis of gout normally relies upon the identification of MSU crystals in SF or from tophi. Where microscopic examination of SF is not available or is impractical, the best approach may differ depending upon the context. For many types of research, clinical classification criteria are necessary. The increasing prevalence of gout, advances in therapeutics and the development of international research collaborations to understand the impact, mechanisms and optimal treatment of this condition emphasize the need for accurate and uniform classification criteria for gout. Five clinical classification criteria for gout currently exist. However, none of the currently available criteria has been adequately validated. An international project is currently under way to develop new validated gout classification criteria. These criteria will be an essential step forward to advance the research agenda in the modern era of gout management.

Keywords: classification; gout; research; urate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>ig</sc>. 1
Fig. 1
Gout classification project structure.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Singh JA, Solomon DH, Dougados M, et al. Development of classification and response criteria for rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:348–52. - PubMed
    1. Zhang W, Doherty M, Pascual E, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part I: Diagnosis. Report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT) Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1301–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kellgren JH, Jeffery MR, Ball JF. The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1963.
    1. Decker JL. Report from the subcommittee on diagnostic criteria for gout. In: Bennett PH, Wood PHN, eds. Population studies of the rheumatic diseases. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, New York, June 5–10, 1966. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation, 1968:385–7.
    1. Wallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, et al. Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum. 1977;20:895–900. - PubMed

Publication types