Sagittal geometry of the middle and lower cervical endplates
- PMID: 23612902
- PMCID: PMC3698350
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2791-8
Sagittal geometry of the middle and lower cervical endplates
Abstract
Purpose: Construct subsidence is a relatively common complication following anterior cervical fusion. Its occurrence has been revealed to be closely related to endplate-implant contact interface. But current literature focusing on the anatomy of cervical endplate is very scarce. The purpose of this morphometric study was to analyse the sagittal geometry, especially the concavity and slope, of vertebral endplates from C3 to C7 by employing data from CT scans.
Methods: Reformatted CT scans of 97 individuals were analyzed and endplate concavity depth, endplate concavity apex location, as well as endplate slope were measured in midsagittal plane. Those specific parameters were compared among different age and gender groups. Meanwhile, comparison between superior and inferior endplate of each vertebra was also performed.
Results: Age and gender did not influence endplate concavity depth, endplate concavity apex location, or endplate slope significantly (P > 0.05). Endplate concavity depths of superior endplates (range 0.9-1.2 mm) were significantly smaller than those of inferior endplates (range 2.1-2.7 mm). Endplate concavity apex was always located in the posterior half of the endplate, with the superior one ranged from 56 to 67% and the inferior one 52 to 57%. Average endplate slopes of superior endplates were between 4.5° and 9.0°, and average inferior endplate slopes ranged from 4.5° to 7.5°. Among all measured segments, C5 had the largest endplate slope values, while C7 the least.
Conclusions: Superior endplate is more flat than its inferior counterpart in middle and lower cervical spine, and the concavity apex is always located in the posterior half of the endplate. Endplate slope is correlated with cervical curvature, greater slope implying more significant lordosis. These sagittal endplate geometrical parameters should be taken into consideration when investigating implant subsidence following anterior cervical fusion.
Figures



Similar articles
-
A morphometric study of the middle and lower cervical vertebral endplates and their components.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(10):e6296. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006296. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 28272256 Free PMC article.
-
Geometry of inferior endplates of the cervical spine.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;142:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Jan 25. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26852320
-
Sagittal endplate morphology of the lower lumbar spine.Eur Spine J. 2012 May;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S160-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2168-4. Eur Spine J. 2012. PMID: 22315035 Free PMC article.
-
Does preoperative inferior endplate morphology influence the outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty at C5-C6 level: A retrospective study.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Mar;190:105666. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105666. Epub 2020 Jan 2. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 31911321
-
Geometry of thoracolumbar vertebral endplates of the human spine.Eur Spine J. 2011 Nov;20(11):1814-20. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1787-5. Epub 2011 Apr 8. Eur Spine J. 2011. PMID: 21475995 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Anterior bone loss: A common phenomenon which should be considered as bone remodeling process existed not only in patients underwent cervical disk replacement but also those with anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion.Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):977-985. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07504-4. Epub 2023 Jan 31. Eur Spine J. 2023. PMID: 36719518
-
A morphometric study of the middle and lower cervical vertebral endplates and their components.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(10):e6296. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006296. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 28272256 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro biomechanical comparison after fixed- and mobile-core artificial cervical disc replacement versus fusion.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(41):e8291. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008291. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29019902 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of 2 Zero-Profile Implants in the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Preliminary Clinical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Fusion.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159761. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27441736 Free PMC article.
-
The footprint mismatch of cervical disc arthroplasty comes from degenerative factor besides ethnic factor.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 5;14(1):20673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71786-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39237767 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1298–1307. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous