Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;22(7):1570-5.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2791-8. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

Sagittal geometry of the middle and lower cervical endplates

Affiliations

Sagittal geometry of the middle and lower cervical endplates

Hong Chen et al. Eur Spine J. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Construct subsidence is a relatively common complication following anterior cervical fusion. Its occurrence has been revealed to be closely related to endplate-implant contact interface. But current literature focusing on the anatomy of cervical endplate is very scarce. The purpose of this morphometric study was to analyse the sagittal geometry, especially the concavity and slope, of vertebral endplates from C3 to C7 by employing data from CT scans.

Methods: Reformatted CT scans of 97 individuals were analyzed and endplate concavity depth, endplate concavity apex location, as well as endplate slope were measured in midsagittal plane. Those specific parameters were compared among different age and gender groups. Meanwhile, comparison between superior and inferior endplate of each vertebra was also performed.

Results: Age and gender did not influence endplate concavity depth, endplate concavity apex location, or endplate slope significantly (P > 0.05). Endplate concavity depths of superior endplates (range 0.9-1.2 mm) were significantly smaller than those of inferior endplates (range 2.1-2.7 mm). Endplate concavity apex was always located in the posterior half of the endplate, with the superior one ranged from 56 to 67% and the inferior one 52 to 57%. Average endplate slopes of superior endplates were between 4.5° and 9.0°, and average inferior endplate slopes ranged from 4.5° to 7.5°. Among all measured segments, C5 had the largest endplate slope values, while C7 the least.

Conclusions: Superior endplate is more flat than its inferior counterpart in middle and lower cervical spine, and the concavity apex is always located in the posterior half of the endplate. Endplate slope is correlated with cervical curvature, greater slope implying more significant lordosis. These sagittal endplate geometrical parameters should be taken into consideration when investigating implant subsidence following anterior cervical fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Landmarks in midsagittal plane: A anterior rim of endplate; P posterior rim of endplate; Ca the concavity apex in midsagittal plane; C’ projective point of Ca on AP
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Landmarks in midsagittal plane: A anterior rim of endplate, P posterior rim of endplate, S superior rim of the anterior wall of vertebral body, I inferior rim of the anterior wall of vertebral body
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schematic illustration of the measurement of superior endplate slope: first locate vertebral landmarks including anterior (A), posterior (P), superior (S), and inferior (I) rim of vertebral body, then connect points A, P as well as S, I, measure the angle formed by the AP and SI line, then subtract that value from 90°

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1298–1307. - PubMed
    1. Emery SE, Bolesta MJ, Banks MA, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical fusion comparison of the standard and modified techniques. Spine. 1994;19:660–663. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199403001-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Jonbergen HP, Spruit M, Anderson PG, Pavlov PW. Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage: early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence. Spine J. 2005;5:645–649. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kao FC, Niu CC, Chen LH, Lai PL, Chen WJ. Maintenance of interbody space in one- and two-level anterior cervical interbody fusion: comparison of the effectiveness of autograft, allograft, and cage. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 2005;430:108–116. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000142626.90278.9e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grob D, Daehn S, Mannion AF. Titanium mesh cages (TMC) in spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:211–221. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0748-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed