Perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse: is it worthwhile in the long-term?
- PMID: 23613218
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-013-1009-8
Perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse: is it worthwhile in the long-term?
Abstract
Background: Perineal stapled prolapse (PSP) resection is a novel operation for treating external rectal prolapse. However, no long-term results have been reported in the literature. This study analyses the long-term recurrence rate, functional outcome, and morbidity associated with PSP resection.
Methods: Nine consecutive patients undergoing PSP resection between 2007 and 2011 were prospectively followed. Surgery was performed by the same surgeons in a standardised technique. Recurrence rate, functional outcome, and complication grade were prospectively assessed.
Results: All 9 patients undergoing PSP resection were investigated. The median age was 72 years (range 25-88 years). No intraoperative complications occurred. Faecal incontinence, preoperatively present in 2 patients, worsened postoperatively in one patient (Vaizey 18-22). One patient developed new-onset faecal incontinence (Vaizey 18). The median obstructive defecation syndrome score decreased postoperatively significantly from 11 (median; range 8-13) to 5 (median; range 4-8) (p < 0.005). At a median follow-up of 40 months (range 14-58 months), the prolapse recurrence rate was 44 % (4/9 patients).
Conclusions: The PSP resection is a fast and safe procedure associated with low morbidity. However, the poor long-term functional outcome and the recurrence rate of 44 % warrant a cautious patient selection.
Similar articles
-
Perineal stapled prolapse resection for full-thickness external rectal prolapse: a multicentre prospective study.Colorectal Dis. 2016 Nov;18(11):1094-1100. doi: 10.1111/codi.13328. Colorectal Dis. 2016. PMID: 26969880
-
Perineal stapled prolapse resection for complete external rectal prolapse: preliminary experience and literature review.Dig Surg. 2012;29(2):87-91. doi: 10.1159/000336209. Epub 2012 Mar 22. Dig Surg. 2012. PMID: 22441663 Review.
-
New kid on the block: perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSP) is it worthwhile in the long-term?Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Jun;401(4):519-29. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1431-2. Epub 2016 Apr 25. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016. PMID: 27114103
-
External prolapse of the rectum: stapled prolapse resection, not only for older and frail patients.Minerva Chir. 2017 Aug;72(4):296-301. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07345-X. Epub 2017 Mar 31. Minerva Chir. 2017. PMID: 28374985
-
[Operative therapy of external rectal prolapse with a stapler].Chirurg. 2016 Nov;87(11):933-937. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0290-2. Chirurg. 2016. PMID: 27678400 Review. German.
Cited by
-
A comparison of perineal stapled prolapse resection and the Altemeier procedure at 2 Canadian academic hospitals.Can J Surg. 2023 Jan 3;66(1):E8-E12. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008421. Print 2023 Jan-Feb. Can J Surg. 2023. PMID: 36596586 Free PMC article.
-
Explaining the undulating outcomes of perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier Procedure) for rectal prolapse over the last century: technique matters!Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Nov;18(11):979-80. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1179-z. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Tech Coloproctol. 2014. PMID: 25082531 No abstract available.
-
[Transtar™ operation for rectocele and obstructed defecation syndrome].Chirurg. 2016 Nov;87(11):924-932. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0298-7. Chirurg. 2016. PMID: 27742925 Review. German.
-
[Complications after rectal prolapse surgery].Chirurg. 2015 Aug;86(8):747-51. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0032-x. Chirurg. 2015. PMID: 26084442 Review. German.
-
Primary and repeated perineal stapled prolapse resection.Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Dec;20(12):853-857. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1557-9. Epub 2016 Nov 25. Tech Coloproctol. 2016. PMID: 27888440
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous