Ultrasound-guided vs endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer diagnosis
- PMID: 23613631
- PMCID: PMC3631989
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i15.2368
Ultrasound-guided vs endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer diagnosis
Abstract
Aim: To clarify the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC).
Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic PC between February 2006 and September 2011 were selected for this retrospective study. FNA biopsy for pancreatic tumors had been performed percutaneously under extracorporeal ultrasound guidance until October 2009; then, beginning in November 2009, EUS-FNA has been performed. We reviewed the complete medical records of all patients who met the selection criteria for the following data: sex, age, location and size of the targeted tumor, histological and/or cytological findings, details of puncture procedures, time from day of puncture until day of definitive diagnosis, and details of severe adverse events.
Results: Of the 121 patients who met the selection criteria, 46 had a percutaneous biopsy (Group A) and 75 had an EUS-FNA biopsy (Group B). Adequate cytological specimens were obtained in 42 Group A patients (91.3%) and all 75 Group B patients (P = 0.0192), and histological specimens were obtained in 41 Group A patients (89.1%) and 65 Group B patients (86.7%). Diagnosis of malignancy by cytology was positive in 33 Group A patients (78.6%) and 72 Group B patients (94.6%) (P = 0.0079). Malignancy by both cytology and pathology was found in 43 Group A (93.5%) and 73 Group B (97.3%) patients. The mean period from the puncture until the cytological diagnosis in Group B was 1.7 d, which was significantly shorter than that in Group A (4.1 d) (P < 0.0001). Severe adverse events were experienced in two Group A patients (4.3%) and in one Group B patient (1.3%).
Conclusion: EUS-FNA, as well as percutaneous needle aspiration, is an effective modality to obtain cytopathological confirmation in patients with advanced PC.
Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration; Pancreatic cancer; Percutaneous needle aspiration.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with a suspected pancreatic malignancy.Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Sep;110(9):544-550. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5455/2017. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018. PMID: 30032635
-
Relationship of pancreatic mass size and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Nov;56(11):3370-5. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1782-z. Epub 2011 Jun 19. Dig Dis Sci. 2011. PMID: 21688127
-
ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ADRENAL METASTASIS IN A HIGH-RISK POPULATION.Endocr Pract. 2017 Dec;23(12):1402-1407. doi: 10.4158/EP-2017-0022. Epub 2017 Nov 16. Endocr Pract. 2017. PMID: 29144794
-
Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4568. Dan Med J. 2012. PMID: 23290296 Review.
-
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic neoplasms: 10-year experience with more than 2,000 cases and a review of the literature.Eur Radiol. 2016 Jun;26(6):1801-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4003-x. Epub 2015 Sep 16. Eur Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26373764 Review.
Cited by
-
Systematic appraisal of guidelines for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.Gland Surg. 2021 Apr;10(4):1487-1498. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-676. Gland Surg. 2021. PMID: 33968700 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comprehensive immunotherapy combined with intratumoral injection of zoledronate-pulsed dendritic cells, intravenous adoptive activated T lymphocyte and gemcitabine in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a phase I/II trial.Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 5;9(2):2838-2847. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22974. eCollection 2018 Jan 5. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29416816 Free PMC article.
-
Pancreatic cancer-improved care achievable.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 14;20(30):10405-18. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10405. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25132756 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transabdominal ultrasound-guided pancreatic biopsy: a neglected but safe, effective and inexpensive procedure that needs to be re-juvinalized.J Ultrasound. 2021 Jun;24(2):175-182. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00542-y. Epub 2021 Feb 1. J Ultrasound. 2021. PMID: 33521888 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic ultrasonography guided-fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of solid pancreaticobiliary lesions: Clinical aspects to improve the diagnosis.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 14;22(2):628-40. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.628. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 26811612 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Goodale RL, Gajl-Peczalska K, Dressel T, Samuelson J. Cytologic studies for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 1981;47:1652–1655. - PubMed
-
- Nakaizumi A, Tatsuta M, Uehara H, Yamamoto R, Takenaka A, Kishigami Y, Takemura K, Kitamura T, Okuda S. Cytologic examination of pure pancreatic juice in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. The endoscopic retrograde intraductal catheter aspiration cytologic technique. Cancer. 1992;70:2610–2614. - PubMed
-
- Di Stasi M, Lencioni R, Solmi L, Magnolfi F, Caturelli E, De Sio I, Salmi A, Buscarini L. Ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses: results of a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1329–1333. - PubMed
-
- Bret PM, Nicolet V, Labadie M. Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas. Diagn Cytopathol. 1986;2:221–227. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous