Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction
- PMID: 23614585
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1210356
Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction
Abstract
Background: Right ventricular pacing restores an adequate heart rate in patients with atrioventricular block, but high percentages of right ventricular apical pacing may promote left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We evaluated whether biventricular pacing might reduce mortality, morbidity, and adverse left ventricular remodeling in such patients.
Methods: We enrolled patients who had indications for pacing with atrioventricular block; New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, II, or III heart failure; and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 50% or less. Patients received a cardiac-resynchronization pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (the latter if the patient had an indication for defibrillation therapy) and were randomly assigned to standard right ventricular pacing or biventricular pacing. The primary outcome was the time to death from any cause, an urgent care visit for heart failure that required intravenous therapy, or a 15% or more increase in the left ventricular end-systolic volume index.
Results: Of 918 patients enrolled, 691 underwent randomization and were followed for an average of 37 months. The primary outcome occurred in 190 of 342 patients (55.6%) in the right-ventricular-pacing group, as compared with 160 of 349 (45.8%) in the biventricular-pacing group. Patients randomly assigned to biventricular pacing had a significantly lower incidence of the primary outcome over time than did those assigned to right ventricular pacing (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% credible interval, 0.60 to 0.90); results were similar in the pacemaker and ICD groups. Left ventricular lead-related complications occurred in 6.4% of patients.
Conclusions: Biventricular pacing was superior to conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction with NYHA class I, II, or III heart failure. (Funded by Medtronic; BLOCK HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00267098.).
Comment in
-
Arrhythmias: Changing indications for biventricular pacing in bradycardia.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Aug;10(8):436-8. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.88. Epub 2013 Jun 11. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23752697
-
BLOCK-HF: a game changer or a step too far?Heart. 2014 Mar;100(5):361-2. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304334. Epub 2013 Jul 10. Heart. 2014. PMID: 23842032 No abstract available.
-
Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction.N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 8;369(6):579. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1306998. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23924013 No abstract available.
-
Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction.N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 8;369(6):578. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1306998. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23924014 No abstract available.
-
Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction.N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 8;369(6):578-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1306998. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23924015 No abstract available.
-
Will biventricular pacing replace right ventricular pacing for antibradycardia therapy?Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Sep;10(5):591-6. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2013.835552. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013. PMID: 24053252
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous