The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: comparison of pain classification features and pain intensity across diverse palliative care settings in eight countries
- PMID: 23614710
- DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0390
The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: comparison of pain classification features and pain intensity across diverse palliative care settings in eight countries
Abstract
Background: Standardized approaches for assessing and classifying cancer pain are required to improve treatment of patients with complex pain profiles. The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) offers a starting point for the evolution of a standardized international classification system for cancer pain and was introduced into multisite research initiatives of the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC).
Objectives: The primary purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of the five ECS-CP pain classification features: pain mechanism, incident pain, psychological distress, addictive behavior, and cognition--in a diverse international sample of patients with advanced cancer.
Methods: A total of 1070 adult patients with advanced cancer were recruited from 17 sites in Norway, the United Kingdom, Austria, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Canada, and Australia; 1051 of 1070 patients were evaluable. A clinician completed the ECS-CP for each enrolled patient. Additional information, including pain intensity, were also collected through patient self-reports, using touch-sensitive computers.
Results: Of 1051 evaluable patients, 670 (64%) were assessed by a clinician as having cancer pain: nociceptive pain (n=534; 79.7%); neuropathic pain (n=113; 16.9%); incident pain (n=408; 60.9%); psychological distress (n=212; 31.6%); addictive behavior (n=30; 4.5%); normal cognition (n=616; 91.9%). The prevalence of ECS-CP features and pain intensity scores (11-item scale; 0=none, 10=worst; rated as now) varied substantially across sites and locations of care.
Conclusion: The ECS-CP is a clinically relevant systematic framework, which is able to detect differences in salient pain classification features across diverse settings and countries. Further validation studies need to be conducted in varied advanced cancer and palliative care settings to advance the development of the ECS-CP toward an internationally recognized pain classification system.
Similar articles
-
Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: Comparison of Pain Classification Features and Pain Intensity across Diverse Palliative Care Settings in Canada.J Palliat Med. 2023 Mar;26(3):366-375. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0187. Epub 2022 Oct 25. J Palliat Med. 2023. PMID: 36282783
-
The routine use of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain in an outpatient supportive care center.Palliat Support Care. 2015 Oct;13(5):1185-92. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514001205. Epub 2014 Oct 14. Palliat Support Care. 2015. PMID: 25311930
-
Assessing the prognostic features of a pain classification system in advanced cancer patients.Support Care Cancer. 2017 Sep;25(9):2863-2869. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3702-z. Epub 2017 Apr 6. Support Care Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28386785
-
A "TNM" classification system for cancer pain: the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP).Support Care Cancer. 2008 Jun;16(6):547-55. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0423-3. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Support Care Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18320239 Review.
-
Expert conference on cancer pain assessment and classification--the need for international consensus: working proposals on international standards.BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011 Dec;1(3):281-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000078. Epub 2011 Oct 13. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011. PMID: 24653469
Cited by
-
The impact of a simplified documentation method for the Edmonton classification system for cancer pain (ECS-CP) on clinician utilization.Support Care Cancer. 2017 Feb;25(2):575-580. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3440-7. Epub 2016 Oct 8. Support Care Cancer. 2017. PMID: 27722795
-
A personalized approach to assessing and managing pain in patients with cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 1;32(16):1640-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2508. Epub 2014 May 5. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24799495 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of Opioid Switching in Advanced Cancer Pain: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 19;15(14):3676. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143676. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37509337 Free PMC article.
-
Clinician's Commentary on Tatham et al.(1.).Physiother Can. 2013 Fall;65(4):331-2. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2012-06-CC. Physiother Can. 2013. PMID: 24396159 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reality of evidence-based practice in palliative care.Cancer Biol Med. 2015 Sep;12(3):193-200. doi: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2015.0041. Cancer Biol Med. 2015. PMID: 26487964 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous