Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 May;15(5):310-20.
doi: 10.1111/jch.12081. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

Antihypertensive effects of statins: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Antihypertensive effects of statins: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled studies

Alexandros Briasoulis et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 May.

Abstract

In experimental studies, statins have been shown to lower blood pressure through increased nitric oxide bioavailability and improved arterial compliance. The clinical significance of this effect remains poorly documented. The authors performed a meta-analysis of the effect of statins on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) including prospective randomized, controlled trials of statin therapy. EMBASE and MEDLINE searches for studies in which patients were randomized to treatment with a statin plus standard treatment (or placebo) vs standard treatment (or placebo) were conducted. Studies that provided data on SBP and DBP values before the initiation of the treatment and at the end of the follow-up period were included. A total of 40 studies with 51 comparison groups examining 22,511 controls and 22,602 patients taking statins were examined. Mean SBP in the statin group decreased by 2.62 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.41 to -1.84; P<.001) and DBP by 0.94 mm Hg (95% CI, -1.31 to -0.57; P<.001). In studies including hypertensive patients, the decrease in blood pressures with statins was slightly greater (SBP, -3.07 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.00 to -2.15 and DBP, 1.04; 95% CI, -1.47 to -0.61). Similarly, statins effectively reduced SBP in diabetic patients. In this large meta-analysis of prospective controlled studies, the authors found a small but statistically significant reduction of SBP in patients taking statins. The decrease in blood pressure may contribute to the pleiotropic effect of statins in reducing cardiovascular risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of study selection. CI indicate 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) achieved in patients taking a statin compared with those taking placebo or other control treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) achieved in patients taking a statin compared with those taking placebo or other control treatment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haug C, Schmid‐Kotsas A, Zorn U, et al. Endothelin‐1 synthesis and endothelin B receptor expression in human coronary artery smooth muscle cells and monocytederived macrophages is up‐regulated by low density lipoproteins. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2001;33:1701–1712. - PubMed
    1. Wassmann S, Laufs U, Baumer AT, et al. HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors improve endothelial dysfunction in normocholesterolemic hypertension via reduced production of reactive oxygen species. Hypertension. 2001;37:1450–1457. - PubMed
    1. Ferrier KE, Muhlmann MH, Baguet JP, et al. Intensive cholesterol reduction lowers blood pressure and large artery stiffness in isolated systolic hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1020–1025. - PubMed
    1. Strazzullo P, Kerry SM, Barbato A, et al. Do statins reduce blood pressure? A meta‐analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Hypertension. 2007;49:792–798. - PubMed
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances