Impact of 5-HTTLPR and BDNF polymorphisms on response to sertraline versus transcranial direct current stimulation: implications for the serotonergic system
- PMID: 23615118
- DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.03.009
Impact of 5-HTTLPR and BDNF polymorphisms on response to sertraline versus transcranial direct current stimulation: implications for the serotonergic system
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been intensively investigated as a non-pharmacological treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). While many studies have examined the genetic predictors of antidepressant medications, this issue remains to be investigated for tDCS. In the current study, we evaluated whether the BDNF Val66Met and the 5-HTT (5-HTTLPR) polymorphisms were associated with tDCS antidepressant response. We used data from a factorial trial that evaluated the efficacy of tDCS and sertraline and enrolled 120 moderate-to-severe, antidepressant-free participants. In the present study, we used analyses of variance to evaluate whether the BDNF (Val/Val vs. Met-carries) and 5-HTTLPR alleles (long/long vs short-carriers) were predictors of tDCS (active/sham) and sertraline (sertraline/placebo) response. Analyses were conducted on the polymorphisms separately and also on their interaction. Genotype frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. BDNF polymorphism was not associated with treatment response. We found that 5-HTTLPR predicted tDCS effects as long/long homozygotes displayed a larger improvement comparing active vs. sham tDCS, while short-allele carriers did not. A dose-response relationship between active-sham differences with the long allele was also suggested. These results strengthen the role of the serotonergic system in the tDCS antidepressant effects and expand previous findings that reported that tDCS mechanisms of action partially involve serotonergic receptors. Therefore, we hypothesize that tDCS is a neuromodulation technique that acts over depression through the modulation of serotonergic system and that tDCS "top-down" antidepressant effects might not be optimal in brain networks with a hyperactive amygdala inducing bottom-up effects, such as occurs in short-carriers.
Keywords: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor polymorphism; Major depressive disorder; Serotonin selective reuptake blockers; Serotonin-transporter-linked-polymorphic region; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Transcranial direct current stimulation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Association of BDNF, HTR2A, TPH1, SLC6A4, and COMT polymorphisms with tDCS and escitalopram efficacy: ancillary analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Braz J Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;42(2):128-135. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0620. Epub 2019 Nov 11. Braz J Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 31721892 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
BDNF plasma levels after antidepressant treatment with sertraline and transcranial direct current stimulation: results from a factorial, randomized, sham-controlled trial.Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Jul;24(7):1144-51. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 27. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014. PMID: 24702987 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Association between serotonin 2A receptor (HTR2A), serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene polymorphisms and citalopram/sertraline induced sexual dysfunction in MDD patients.Pharmacogenomics J. 2020 Jun;20(3):443-450. doi: 10.1038/s41397-019-0127-8. Epub 2019 Dec 3. Pharmacogenomics J. 2020. PMID: 31792367
-
Epigenetic and epistatic interactions between serotonin transporter and brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism: insights in depression.Neuroscience. 2014 Sep 5;275:455-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.036. Epub 2014 Jun 24. Neuroscience. 2014. PMID: 24972302 Review.
-
Neuroimaging genetics: new perspectives in research on major depression?Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008 Nov;118(5):363-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01225.x. Epub 2008 Jul 14. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008. PMID: 18644006 Review.
Cited by
-
A Meta-analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies Examining the Reliability of Effects on Language Measures.Brain Stimul. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):1093-100. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 27. Brain Stimul. 2015. PMID: 26210573 Free PMC article.
-
Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: Optimizing Trials Toward Clinical Use.J Clin Neurol. 2022 Jul;18(4):391-400. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.391. J Clin Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35796264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anatomical Parameters of tDCS to Modulate the Motor System after Stroke: A Review.Front Neurol. 2017 Feb 9;8:29. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00029. eCollection 2017. Front Neurol. 2017. PMID: 28232816 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies.Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 May 12;9:181. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00181. eCollection 2015. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26029052 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) as augmentation therapy in late-life depression (LLD) with suboptimal response to treatment-a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial.Trials. 2022 Oct 28;23(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06855-z. Trials. 2022. PMID: 36307858 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous