Comparison between an online self-administered and an interviewer-administered version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire: a cross-sectional validation study
- PMID: 23616053
- PMCID: PMC6442815
- DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00041
Comparison between an online self-administered and an interviewer-administered version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire: a cross-sectional validation study
Abstract
Background: Online self-management programmes for asthma have recently become available. International guidelines suggest that the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) can be used in these programmes. In order to assess the current level of control and guide therapy, the same cut-off values are being used as in conventional asthma management. However, results might differ between different types of administration of the ACQ.
Aims: To assess the agreement between an online self-administered version of the ACQ and an interviewer-administered version at a routine visit.
Methods: Cross-sectional data from primary care asthma patients in the Asthma Control Cost Utility Randomized Trial Evaluation (ACCURATE) trial aged 18-50 years and prescribed inhaled steroids were analysed. We selected patients who self-administered an ACQ online and subsequently had an ACQ completed by a nurse practitioner within 7 days at a trial-related control visit. ACQ scores were calculated and agreement assessed by paired t-tests, Pearson's correlation coefficient and a Bland-Altman plot.
Results: A total of 351 patients were eligible (68% female, mean age 40 years). The time interval between the two versions was 3.2 days. There was a significant difference of 0.14 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.20; p<0.001) between the results of the online self-administered ACQ (mean 1.04±0.04) and the interviewer-administered ACQ results (0.90±0.04). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.79. The limits of agreement (-0.86, 1.14) exceeded the predefined minimal clinically important difference between results (±0.5). The Bland-Altman plot therefore showed insufficient agreement.
Conclusions: Assessment of asthma control by the ACQ is influenced by the type of administration. Our results suggest that better control of asthma is perceived when interacting with a caregiver than by online self-assessment.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to this article. TRJS is an Associate editor of the
Figures


Similar articles
-
Validation of online Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.ERJ Open Res. 2020 Jan 27;6(1):00289-2019. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00289-2019. eCollection 2020 Jan. ERJ Open Res. 2020. PMID: 32010723 Free PMC article.
-
Weekly self-monitoring and treatment adjustment benefit patients with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma: an analysis of the SMASHING study.Respir Res. 2010 Jun 10;11(1):74. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-74. Respir Res. 2010. PMID: 20537124 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Validation of online version of asthma control questionnaire in pediatric patients.J Asthma. 2023 Aug;60(8):1553-1557. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2158859. Epub 2023 Jan 3. J Asthma. 2023. PMID: 36547369
-
Measurement of asthma control according to Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines: a comparison with the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Respir Res. 2012 Jun 22;13(1):50. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-50. Respir Res. 2012. PMID: 22726416 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Spanish version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Clin Ther. 2008 Oct;30(10):1918-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.10.005. Clin Ther. 2008. PMID: 19014848
Cited by
-
Weekly self-measurement of FEV1 and PEF and its impact on ACQ (asthma control questionnaire)-scores: 12-week observational study with 76 patients.NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Dec 8;27(1):64. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0064-4. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017. PMID: 29222436 Free PMC article.
-
Atopy and Specific Cancer Sites: a Review of Epidemiological Studies.Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016 Dec;51(3):338-352. doi: 10.1007/s12016-016-8559-2. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016. PMID: 27277132 Review.
-
Validation of online Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.ERJ Open Res. 2020 Jan 27;6(1):00289-2019. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00289-2019. eCollection 2020 Jan. ERJ Open Res. 2020. PMID: 32010723 Free PMC article.
-
Minimal clinically important difference for asthma endpoints: an expert consensus report.Eur Respir Rev. 2020 Jun 3;29(156):190137. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0137-2019. Print 2020 Jun 30. Eur Respir Rev. 2020. PMID: 32499305 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Expert Panel Report 3. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. 2007.
-
- Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. 2006.
-
- Juniper EF, O'Byrne PM, Guyatt GH, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. Eur Respir J 1999;14:902–07. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14d29.x - PubMed
-
- The Dutch General Practice Society (NHG) guideline. Asthma in adults. 2007.
-
- Araújo L, Jacinto T, Moreira A, et al. Clinical efficacy of web-based versus standard asthma self-management. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2012;22:28–34. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical