Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Sep;22(3):284-9.
doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00041.

Comparison between an online self-administered and an interviewer-administered version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire: a cross-sectional validation study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison between an online self-administered and an interviewer-administered version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire: a cross-sectional validation study

Persijn J Honkoop et al. Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Online self-management programmes for asthma have recently become available. International guidelines suggest that the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) can be used in these programmes. In order to assess the current level of control and guide therapy, the same cut-off values are being used as in conventional asthma management. However, results might differ between different types of administration of the ACQ.

Aims: To assess the agreement between an online self-administered version of the ACQ and an interviewer-administered version at a routine visit.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from primary care asthma patients in the Asthma Control Cost Utility Randomized Trial Evaluation (ACCURATE) trial aged 18-50 years and prescribed inhaled steroids were analysed. We selected patients who self-administered an ACQ online and subsequently had an ACQ completed by a nurse practitioner within 7 days at a trial-related control visit. ACQ scores were calculated and agreement assessed by paired t-tests, Pearson's correlation coefficient and a Bland-Altman plot.

Results: A total of 351 patients were eligible (68% female, mean age 40 years). The time interval between the two versions was 3.2 days. There was a significant difference of 0.14 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.20; p<0.001) between the results of the online self-administered ACQ (mean 1.04±0.04) and the interviewer-administered ACQ results (0.90±0.04). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.79. The limits of agreement (-0.86, 1.14) exceeded the predefined minimal clinically important difference between results (±0.5). The Bland-Altman plot therefore showed insufficient agreement.

Conclusions: Assessment of asthma control by the ACQ is influenced by the type of administration. Our results suggest that better control of asthma is perceived when interacting with a caregiver than by online self-assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to this article. TRJS is an Associate editor of the PCRJ, but was not involved in the editorial review of, nor the decision to publish, this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Results of online self-administered Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) results plotted against the results of the interviewer-administered version. On the x=y line of identity the results are identical and they agree sufficiently when they lie within the upper and lower minimal important difference (MID=0.5). The three categories of current asthma control (controlled, partly controlled, and uncontrolled) are also depicted. Treatment decisions will differ if the asthma control category by the online self-administered and the interviewer-administered versions of the ACQ do not concur
Figure 2
Figure 2. Bland-Altman plot showing the average scores of the online self-administered and interviewer-administered Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) plotted on the x-axis against the difference between both results on the y-axis. The mean difference between the versions was 0.14. The predefined limits of sufficient agreement between both versions were the minimal important difference (MID) at +0.5 and −0.5 (dotted lines). The limits of agreement (±2SD) are also shown at 1.14 and −0.86 (solid lines). Both limits of agreement lie outside the MID and therefore there is not sufficient agreement between the two versions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Expert Panel Report 3. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. 2007.
    1. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. 2006.
    1. Juniper EF, O'Byrne PM, Guyatt GH, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. Eur Respir J 1999;14:902–07. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14d29.x - PubMed
    1. The Dutch General Practice Society (NHG) guideline. Asthma in adults. 2007.
    1. Araújo L, Jacinto T, Moreira A, et al. Clinical efficacy of web-based versus standard asthma self-management. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2012;22:28–34. - PubMed

Publication types