Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Oct;15(10):1782-6.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt049. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

CO exposure and puff topography are associated with Lebanese waterpipe dependence scale score

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

CO exposure and puff topography are associated with Lebanese waterpipe dependence scale score

Karem H Alzoubi et al. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Waterpipe tobacco smoking involves self-administration of the dependence-producing drug nicotine. Few studies have examined if dependence in waterpipe smokers influences toxicant exposure and smoking behavior.

Method: Current waterpipe tobacco smokers were categorized based on Lebanese Waterpipe Dependence Scale-11 (LWDS-11) score (LWDS-11: LOW < 7; N = 59; HIGH > 13; N = 59). Participants abstained from smoking for 12 hr and then completed a single 30-min waterpipe tobacco smoking episode. Expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) was measured before and 5 min after smoking and puff topography was measured during smoking.

Results: Total mean smoking time was 30.9 min (SD = 3.5) and did not differ significantly by LWDS-11 score. CO boost was greater for participants in the HIGH versus LOW groups (62.3 vs. 43.6 ppm, p < .01). Similarly, those in the HIGH versus LOW group took more puffs (198.6 vs. 157.1 puffs, p < .01), longer duration puffs (2.7 vs. 2.3 s, p < .05), puffs with lower flow rate (10.3 vs. 12.6 L/min, p < .01), and less time between puffs (8.0 vs. 12.4 s, p < .001).

Conclusion: The puff topography of waterpipe tobacco smokers can be predicted by LWDS-11 score, with those scoring higher taking longer duration and lower velocity puffs at a higher frequency. These behavioral differences may underlie the 40% greater CO exposure observed for those with higher LWDS-11 scores. To the extent that waterpipe dependence is associated with more smoke inhalation, more dependent smokers will be exposed to greater amounts of toxic smoke constituents.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Akl E. A., Gaddam S., Gunukula S. K., Honeine R., Jaoude P. A., Irani J. (2010). The effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39, 834–857 doi:10.1093/ije/dyq002 - PubMed
    1. Al Rashidi M., Shihadeh A., Saliba N. A. (2008). Volatile aldehydes in the mainstream smoke of the narghile waterpipe. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46, 3546–3549 doi:10.1016/j.fct.2008.09.007 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alsatari E. S., Azab M., Khabour O. F., Alzoubi K. H., Sadiq M. F. (2012). Assessment of DNA damage using chromosomal aberrations assay in lymphocytes of waterpipe smokers. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 25, 218–224 doi:10.2478/S13382-012-0027-5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blank M. D., Cobb C. O., Kilgalen B., Austin J., Weaver M. F., Shihadeh A., Eissenberg T. (2011). Acute effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking: A double-blind, placebo-control study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 116, 102–109 doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.11.026 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eissenberg T., Shihadeh A. (2009). Waterpipe tobacco and cigarette smoking: Direct comparison of toxicant exposure. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37, 518–523 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.014 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources