Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 7;1(3):213-20.
doi: 10.4338/ACI-2010-02-RA-0011. Print 2010.

Medication safety improves after implementation of positive patient identification

Medication safety improves after implementation of positive patient identification

Higgins T et al. Appl Clin Inform. .

Abstract

Objective: To report the incidence and severity of medication safety events before and after initiation of barcode scanning for positive patient identification (PPID) in a large teaching hospital.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from an existing safety reporting system with anonymous and non-punitive self-reporting. Medication safety events were categorized as "near-miss" (unsafe conditions or caught before reaching the patient) or reaching the patient, with requisite additional monitoring or treatment. Baseline and post-PPID implementation data on events per 1,000,000 drug administrations were compared by chi-square with p<0.05 considered significant.

Results: An average of 510,541 doses were dispensed each month in 2008. Total self-reported medication errors initially increased from 20 per million doses dispensed pre-barcoding (first quarter 2008) to 38 per million doses dispensed immediately post-intervention (last quarter 2008), but errors reaching the patient decreased from 3.26 per million to 0.8 per million despite the increase in "near-misses". A number of process issues were identified and improved, including additional training and equipment, instituting ParX scanning when filling Pyxis machines, and lobbying for a manufacturing change in how bar codes were printed on bags of intravenous solutions to reduce scanning failures.

Conclusion: Introduction of barcoding of medications and patient wristbands reduced serious medication dispensing errors reaching the patient, but temporarily increased the number of "near-miss" situations reported. Overall patient safety improved with the barcoding and positive patient identification initiative. These results have been sustained during the 18 months following full implementation.

Keywords: Patient safety; computerized provider order entry; harm scores; informatics; pharmacy; positive patient identification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dispensing errors per million doses, calendar year 2007-2009. In the five quarters prior to intervention, medication errors reaching patients averaged 2.53 per million (dark color), with 23.94 „near misses“ per million (light color). The pilot program occured during the Q2 of 2008, with roll-out to critical care units and hospital wide in Q3 of 2008. In the five quarters post-intervention, near misses remained at 23.5/million, but medication errors reaching the patient decreased to 0.69 per million doses, a 73% decrease (p<0.05).

References

    1. Amarasingham R, Plantinga L, Diener-West M, Gaskin DJ, Powe NR. Clinical information technologies and patient outcomes: A multiple hospital study. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 108-114 - PubMed
    1. Poon EG, Cina JL, Churchill W, Patel N, Feathersotone E, Rothschild JM, Keohane CA, Whittemore AD, Bates DW, Gandhi TK. Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 426-434 - PubMed
    1. Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, Ditmore M, Barne A, Levtzion-Korach O, Moniz T, Rothschild JM, Kachalia AB, Hayes J, Churchill WW, Lipsitz S, Whitemore AD, Bates DW, Gandi TK. Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1698-1707 - PubMed
    1. Leape LL, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1995; 274: 29-34 - PubMed
    1. University Health Consortium: UHC Patient Safety Net website https://www.uhc.edu/11851.htm. Accessed 1/27/10