Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May 25;2(2):165-76.
doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0003. Print 2011.

Adoption of electronic health records: a qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators

L Grabenbauer  1 , R Fraser, J McClay, N Woelfl, C B Thompson, J Cambell, J Windle
Affiliations

Adoption of electronic health records: a qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators

L Grabenbauer et al. Appl Clin Inform. .

Abstract

Objective: Less than 20% of hospitals in the US have an electronic health record (EHR). In this qualitative study, we examine the perspectives of both academic and private physicians and administrators as stakeholders, and their alignment, to explore their perspectives on the use of technology in the clinical environment.

Methods: Focus groups were conducted with 74 participants who were asked a series of open-ended questions. Grounded theory was used to analyze the transcribed data and build convergent themes. The relevance and importance of themes was constructed by examining frequency, convergence, and intensity. A model was proposed that represents the interactions between themes.

Results: Six major themes emerged, which include the impact of EHR systems on workflow, patient care, communication, research/outcomes/billing, education/learning, and institutional culture. Academic and private physicians were confident of the future benefits of EHR systems, yet cautious about the current implementations of EHR, and its impact on interactions with other members of the healthcare team and with patients, and the amount of time necessary to use EHR's. Private physicians differed on education and were uneasy about the steep learning curve necessary for use of new systems. In contrast to physicians, university and hospital administrators are optimistic, and value the availability of data for use in reporting.

Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that both private and academic physicians concur on the need for features that maintain and enhance the relationship with the patient and the healthcare team. Resistance to adoption is related to insufficient functionality and its potential negative impact on patient care. Integration of data collection into clinical workflows must consider the unexpected costs of data acquisition.

Keywords: Adoption; health information technology; workflow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Research timeline and methodology.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Six adoption themes defined.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kohn Lea. To err is human : National Academy Press; 1999
    1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st Century. 1st ed.: National Academies Press; 2001 - PubMed
    1. Safety, Committee on Data Standards for Patient Patient safety: achieving a new standard for care. 1st ed.: National Academies Press; 2004 - PubMed
    1. HIMSS Definitions [Internet] Chicago: Healthcare Information and Management Systems; [cited 2011 Mar 23]. Available fromhttp://www.himss.org/ASP/topics_ehr.asp
    1. Bates DW, Ebell M, Gotlieb E, Zapp J, Mullins HC. A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10(1): 1–10 - PMC - PubMed