Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 8;104(1):e80-1.
doi: 10.1007/BF03405660.

Sex and gender reporting in health research: why Canada should be a leader

Joy L Johnson  1 , Alain Beaudet
Affiliations

Sex and gender reporting in health research: why Canada should be a leader

Joy L Johnson et al. Can J Public Health. .

Abstract
in English, French

Sex and gender have been demonstrated to influence all domains of health, from basic mechanisms of disease development to health service utilization. It is therefore no longer acceptable to ignore sex and gender issues in health research reports if these reports are to be deemed accurate. Funding agencies and journals have been identified as primary change agents in health research systems. Canada is making progress on the funding side of the equation--applicants to Canada's federal health research funding agency are required to justify why sex and gender are relevant or not to their research designs. We argue that it is now time for Canada's leading health research journals to follow suit. We have a unique opportunity in Canada to demonstrate leadership in doing science better with sex and gender--and we should not let it be missed.

Il est prouvé que le sexe et le genre influencent la santé sous tous ses aspects: des mécanismes fondamentaux de l’évolution des maladies à l’utilisation des services de santé. Il n’est donc plus acceptable de faire abstraction du sexe et de la problématique homme-femmes dans les rapports de recherche en santé si l’on veut qu’ils reflètent la réalité. Les organismes de financement et les revues sont reconnus comme étant les principaux agents de changement dans le système de recherche en santé. Le Canada fait des progrès du côté financier de l’équation - les demandeurs auprès de l’organisme fédéral canadien qui finance la recherche en santé sont tenus d’expliquer la pertinence (ou non) du sexe et du genre dans leur modèles de recherche. Nous faisons valoir qu’il est temps pour les grandes revues de recherche en santé du Canada d’emboîter le pas. Nous avons une occasion unique, au Canada, de faire preuve de leadership en améliorant la science par le sexe et le genre; il ne faudrait pas laisser échapper cette occasion.

Keywords: Sex; policy; publishing; research design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Krieger N. Genders, sexes, and health: What are the connections - and why does it matter? Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:652–57. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg156. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Putting gender on the agenda [Editorial]. Nature. 2010;465:665. - PubMed
    1. Kim AM, Tingen CM, Woodruff TK. Sex bias in trials and treatment must end. Nature. 2010;465:688–89. doi: 10.1038/465688a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zucker I, Beery AK. Males still dominate animal studies. Nature. 2010;465:690. doi: 10.1038/465690a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wald C, Wu C. Of mice and women: The bias in animal models. Science. 2010;327:1571–72. doi: 10.1126/science.327.5973.1571. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources