Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 24:6:1-11.
doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.19649.

Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation

Joachim Osur  1 , Traci L Baird, Brooke A Levandowski, Emily Jackson, Daniel Murokora
Affiliations

Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation

Joachim Osur et al. Glob Health Action. .

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care (MPAC) in two African countries.

Design: Qualitative, program evaluation.

Setting: Twenty-five public and private health facilities in Rift Valley Province, Kenya, and Kampala Province, Uganda.

Sample: Forty-five MPAC providers, health facility managers, Ministry of Health officials, and non-governmental (NGO) staff involved in program implementation.

Methods and main outcome measures: In both countries, the Ministry of Health, local health centers and hospitals, and NGO staff developed evidence-based service delivery protocols to introduce MPAC in selected facilities; implementation extended from January 2009 to October 2010. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews evaluated the implementation process, identified supportive and inhibitive policies for implementation, elicited lessons learned during the process, and assessed provider satisfaction and providers' impressions of client satisfaction with MPAC. Project reports were also reviewed.

Results: In both countries, MPAC was easy to use, and freed up provider time and health facility resources traditionally necessary for provision of PAC with uterine aspiration. On-going support of providers following training ensured high quality of care. Providers perceived that many women preferred MPAC, as they avoided instrumentation of the uterus, hospital admission, cost, and stigma associated with abortion. Appropriate registration of misoprostol for use in the pilot, and maintaining supplies of misoprostol, were significant challenges to service provision. Support from the Ministry of Health was necessary for successful implementation; lack of country-based standards and guidelines for MPAC created challenges.

Conclusions: MPAC is simple, cost-effective and can be readily implemented in settings with high rates of abortion-related mortality.

Keywords: implementation research; misoprostol; postabortion care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timeline for implementation of MPAC in Kenya and Uganda.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Grimes DA. Unsafe abortion: the silent scourge. Br Med Bull. 2003;67:99–113. - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Wulf D, Hussain R, Bankole A, Sedgh G. Abortion worldwide: a decade of uneven progress. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2009.
    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Shah I, Ahman E, Henshaw S, Bankole A. Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. Lancet. 2012;379:625–32. - PubMed
    1. Kenya Penal Code. 1973. Sections 158–160, 214 and 240. Kenya.
    1. Constitution of the Republic of Uganda. Uganda; 1995. Part XIV(b), XX, articles 22.2, 27, 34(3) and 41.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources