Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Apr 25:10:51.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-51.

Comparison of older and newer generations of ActiGraph accelerometers with the normal filter and the low frequency extension

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of older and newer generations of ActiGraph accelerometers with the normal filter and the low frequency extension

Kelli L Cain et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: Many studies used the older ActiGraph (7164) for physical activity measurement, but this model has been replaced with newer ones (e.g., GT3X+). The assumption that new generation models are more accurate has been questioned, especially for measuring lower intensity levels. The low-frequency extension (LFE) increases the low-intensity sensitivity of newer models, but its comparability with older models is unknown. This study compared step counts and physical activity collected with the 7164 and GT3X + using the Normal Filter and the LFE (GT3X+N and GT3X+LFE, respectively).

Findings: Twenty-five adults wore 2 accelerometer models simultaneously for 3 days and were instructed to engage in typical behaviors. Average daily step counts and minutes per day in nonwear, sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous activity were calculated. Repeated measures ANOVAs with post-hoc pairwise comparisons were used to compare mean values. Means for the GT3X+N and 7164 were significantly different in 4 of the 6 categories (p<.05). The GT3X+N showed 2041 fewer steps per day and more sedentary, less light, and less moderate than the 7164 (+25.6, -31.2, -2.9 mins/day, respectively). The GT3X+LFE showed non-significant differences in 5 of 6 categories but recorded significantly more steps (+3597 steps/day; p<.001) than the 7164.

Conclusion: Studies using the newer ActiGraphs should employ the LFE for greater sensitivity to lower intensity activity and more comparable activity results with studies using the older models. Newer generation ActiGraphs do not produce comparable step counts to the older generation devices with the Normal filter or the LFE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Activity and step count comparisons between 7164 and GT3X + with the Normal Filter and LFE. Panels 1-6.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bland-Altman plots for nonwear, sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous activity. Panels 1-5.

References

    1. John D, Freesdon P. ActiGraph and actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(Suppl 1):S86–S89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen KY, Bassett DR. The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(Suppl 1):S490–S500. - PubMed
    1. ActiGraph website. http://www.theactigraph.com.
    1. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1):181–188. - PubMed
    1. Ekelund U, Sardinha LB, Andersson SA, Harro M, Franks PW, Brage S, Cooper AR, Andersen LB, Riddoch C, Froberg K. Associations between objectively assessed physical activity and indicators of body fatness in 9- and 10-yr old children: a population based study from 4 distinct regions in Europe (the European Youth Heart Study) Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:584–590. - PubMed

Publication types