Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Sep;69(9):1617-33.
doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1510-z. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

Novel oral anticoagulants: clinical pharmacology, indications and practical considerations

Affiliations
Review

Novel oral anticoagulants: clinical pharmacology, indications and practical considerations

Sebastian Harder et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Novel oral anticoagulants are approved in several indications: rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip or knee replacement surgery, and edoxaban for hip or knee replacement surgery and hip fracture surgery (in Japan only); rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and prevention of recurrent DVT and PE; and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. These agents overcome some limitations of traditional anticoagulants, are suggested to have no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring, and are administered orally. Rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran have different pharmacological characteristics, and guidance is needed on optimum doses and dosing intervals and the effects of renal or hepatic impairment, age, food, and other drugs. Dabigatran has stricter prescribing advice than rivaroxaban or apixaban for patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment. All three drugs have restrictions on use in patients with hepatic impairment. Apixaban requires twice-daily dosing in all indications, whereas rivaroxaban and dabigatran are dosed once- or twice-daily depending on indication. Although head-to-head comparisons are lacking, the novel oral anticoagulants may show favorable cost-benefit relations compared with traditional vitamin K antagonists or no therapy.

Aim: This review summarizes the pharmacology of rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, and the indications for which they are approved. Issues regarding the optimization of the use of these anticoagulants for the management of thromboembolic disorders will also be discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):806-17 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(1):1-22 - PubMed
    1. J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Mar;3(3):514-21 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 10;361(24):2342-52 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 26;358(26):2765-75 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources