Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Apr 19;8(4):e61320.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061320. Print 2013.

Reproducibility of non-invasive assessment of skin endothelial function using laser Doppler flowmetry and laser speckle contrast imaging

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Reproducibility of non-invasive assessment of skin endothelial function using laser Doppler flowmetry and laser speckle contrast imaging

Cyril Puissant et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Endothelial dysfunction precedes atherosclerosis. Vasodilation induced by acetylcholine (ACh) is a specific test of endothelial function. Reproducibility of laser techniques such as laser-Doppler-flowmetry (LDF) and Laser-speckle-contrast-imaging (LSCI) to detect ACh vasodilation is debated and results expressions lack standardization. We aimed to study at a 7-day interval (i) the inter-subject reproducibility, (ii) the intra-subjects reproducibility, and (iii) the effect of the results expressions over variability.

Methods and results: Using LDF and LSCI simultaneously, we performed two different ACh-iontophoresis protocols. The maximal ACh vasodilation (peak-ACh) was expressed as absolute or normalized flow or conductance values. Inter-subject reproducibility was expressed as coefficient of variation (inter-CV,%). Intra-subject reproducibility was expressed as within subject coefficients of variation (intra-CV,%), and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Fifteen healthy subjects were included. The inter-subject reproducibility of peak-ACh depended upon the expression of the results and ranged from 55% to 162% for LDF and from 17% to 83% for LSCI. The intra-subject reproducibility (intra-CV/ICC) of peak-ACh was reduced when assessed with LSCI compared to LDF no matter how the results were expressed and whatever the protocol used. The highest intra-subject reproducibility was found using LSCI. It was 18.7%/0.87 for a single current stimulation (expressed as cutaneous vascular conductance) and 11.4%/0.61 for multiple current stimulations (expressed as absolute value).

Conclusion: ACh-iontophoresis coupled with LSCI is a promising test to assess endothelial function because it is reproducible, safe, and non-invasive. N°: NCT01664572.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Typical recording using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) during protocol 1 and protocol 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean vasodilation patterns obtained with ACh iontophoresis between D1 and D7 for each technique (LDF: laser Doppler flowmetry and LSCI: laser speckle contrast imaging) using a single current stimulation (0.1 mA and 30 s).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mean vasodilation patterns obtained with ACh iontophoresis between D1 and D7 for each technique (LDF: laser Doppler flowmetry and LSCI: laser speckle contrast imaging) using multiple current stimulations (0.1 mA and 10 s separated with a 2-minute interval).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO (2007) Recommendations for Prevention of Cardiovascular disease: Guidelines for assessment and management for cardiovascular risk. Geneva, Switzerland World health organization.
    1. Ross R (1993) The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature 362: 801–809. - PubMed
    1. Bonetti PO, Lerman LO, Lerman A (2003) Endothelial dysfunction: a marker of atherosclerotic risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23: 168–175. - PubMed
    1. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, Spiegelhalter DJ, Miller OI, et al. (1992) Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet 340: 1111–1115. - PubMed
    1. Flammer AJ, Anderson T, Celermajer DS, Creager MA, Deanfield J, et al. (2012) The assessment of endothelial function: from research into clinical practice. Circulation 126: 753–767. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data