Similar articles

• Comment on authors' reply: Patients' perception of risk: informed choice in prenatal testing for foetal aneuploidy.

  Yeo GS, Choi C. Yeo GS, et al. Singapore Med J. 2013 Apr;54(4):237-8. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013083. Singapore Med J. 2013. PMID: 23624456 No abstract available.
• Comment on: patients' perception of risk: informed choice in prenatal testing for foetal aneuploidy.

  Yeo GS, Choi C. Yeo GS, et al. Singapore Med J. 2012 Dec;53(12):853-4; author's reply p. 854. Singapore Med J. 2012. PMID: 23268161 No abstract available.
• Patients' perception of risk: informed choice in prenatal testing for foetal aneuploidy.

  Choolani M, Biswas A. Choolani M, et al. Singapore Med J. 2012 Oct;53(10):633-6; quiz 637. Singapore Med J. 2012. PMID: 23112012 Review.
• Prenatal paradox: an integrative review of women's experiences with prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy and neural tube defects.

  Shea TL. Shea TL. Contemp Nurse. 2017 Apr;53(2):235-261. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2016.1269609. Epub 2016 Dec 30. Contemp Nurse. 2017. PMID: 27931155 Review.
• Parents' perspectives on the unforeseen finding of a fetal sex chromosomal aneuploidy.

  Pieters JJ, Kooper AJ, Eggink AJ, Verhaak CM, Otten BJ, Braat DD, Smits AP, van Leeuwen E. Pieters JJ, et al. Prenat Diagn. 2011 Mar;31(3):286-92. doi: 10.1002/pd.2707. Epub 2011 Feb 4. Prenat Diagn. 2011. PMID: 21294136