Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;79(13):4173-7.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00420-13. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

U(VI) reduction in sulfate-reducing subsurface sediments amended with ethanol or acetate

Affiliations

U(VI) reduction in sulfate-reducing subsurface sediments amended with ethanol or acetate

Brandon J Converse et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

An experiment was conducted with subsurface sediments from Oak Ridge National Laboratory to determine the potential for reduction of U(VI) under sulfate-reducing conditions with either ethanol or acetate as the electron donor. The results showed extensive U(VI) reduction in sediments supplied with either electron donor, where geochemical and microbiological analyses demonstrated active sulfate reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Concentrations of ethanol, acetate, nitrate, sulfate, 0.5 M HCl-extractable Fe(II), aqueous U(VI), and NaHCO3-extractable U(VI) during the initial phase of the sediment slurry experiment designed to drive the slurries into sulfate-reducing conditions.
Fig 2
Fig 2
(A and B) Concentrations of ethanol (panel A only), acetate, sulfate, and 0.5 M HCl-extractable Fe(II) in 13C-labeled ethanol (A)- or 13C-labeled acetate (B)-amended slurries during the second (sulfate-reducing) phase of the sediment slurry experiment; panel B also shows sulfate and Fe(II) concentrations in unamended (control) slurries. (C and D) Concentrations of aqueous U(VI) and NaHCO3-extractable U(VI) in ethanol- or acetate-amended or unamended (control) slurries during the second phase of the sediment slurry experiment.
Fig 3
Fig 3
(A) Relative abundances determined by GC-FID. (B) δ13C values for PLFAs determined by GC-IRMS. All data are from the 13C-labeled ethanol- and 13C-labeled acetate-amended slurries from the second phase of the experiment. All δ13C values for the control (unamended) slurries were between 0 and −21‰ and are not shown in panel B. Individual components of the summed PLFA 13C peaks, as inferred from parallel PLFA mass quantifications (see the text), are indicated in panel A.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Williams KH, Bargar JR, Lloyd JR, Lovley DR. 15 November 2012. Bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater: a systems approach to subsurface biogeochemistry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. [Epub ahead of print.]10.1016/j.copbio.2012.10.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wall JD, Krumholz LR. 2006. Uranium reduction. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 60:149–166 - PubMed
    1. Beliaev AS, Saffarini DA, McLaughlin JL, Hunnicutt D. 2001. MtrC, an outer membrane decahaem c cytochrome required for metal reduction in Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1. Mol. Microbiol. 39:722–730 - PubMed
    1. Gorby YA, Lovley DR. 1992. Enzymatic uranium precipitation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:205–207
    1. Payne RB, Gentry DA, Rapp-Giles BJ, Casalot L, Wall JD. 2002. Uranium reduction by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans strain G20 and a cytochrome c3 mutant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:3129–3132 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources