Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e14-22.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050645. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages

Linda D Cameron  1 , Jessica K Pepper  2 , Noel T Brewer  2
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages

Linda D Cameron et al. Tob Control. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Background: In 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed a series of 36 graphic warning labels for cigarette packages. We sought to evaluate the effects of the labels on fear-related emotions about health consequences of smoking and smoking motivations of young adults.

Methods: We conducted an experimental study in 2010-2011 with 325 smokers and non-smokers ages 18-30 years whom we recruited through community distribution lists in North Carolina and through a national survey company. Each participant viewed 27 labels (18 of the proposed labels with graphic images and text warnings and 9 with text-only warnings) in a random order, evaluating each label on understandability and its effects on fear-related reactions and discouragement from wanting to smoke.

Results: Respondents found most of the proposed labels easy to understand. Of the 36 labels, 64% induced greater fear-related reactions and 58% discouraged respondents from wanting to smoke more than the corresponding text-only labels did. Labels with the greatest effects had photographs (as compared with drawings or other art graphics) or depicted diseased body parts or suffering or dead people. In almost every comparison, smokers reported lower fear-related reactions and feeling less discouraged from wanting to smoke relative to non-smokers.

Conclusions: Most of the proposed labels enhanced fear-related reactions about health consequences of smoking and reduced motivations to smoke relative to text-only labels, although some had larger effects than others. All but one of the nine warning labels recently adopted by the FDA enhanced fear-related reactions and reduced smoking motivations.

Keywords: Packaging and Labelling; Prevention; Public policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The eight graphic warning labels with the greatest impact on: (A) fear of harms and (B) feeling discouraged from wanting to smoke.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, et al. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004;291:1234–45. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011: warning about the dangers of tobacco. WHO Report. 2011
    1. World Health Organization. WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
    1. Hammond D. Evidence review. [accessed 15 Jun 2012];Tobacco labeling and packaging toolkit. 2012 http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/toolkit.
    1. Leventhal H, Brissette I, Leventhal EA. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal H, editors. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. London, UK: Routledge; 2003. pp. 42–65.

Publication types