Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safety following percutaneous coronary intervention
- PMID: 23624930
- DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0231-9
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safety following percutaneous coronary intervention
Abstract
In the first 8 weeks after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), possible negative interactions exist between the cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging environment and the weakly ferromagnetic material in coronary stents. There are circumstances when CMR would be indicated shortly following PCI, such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The purpose of this study is to demonstrate CMR safety shortly following stent PCI in AMI patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of safety data in AMI patients with recently placed coronary artery stents enrolled in a multi-center phase II trial for gadoversetamide. Patients underwent 1.5 T CMR within 16 days of PCI. Vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature) and ECGs were taken pre-CMR, 1, 2, and 24 h post-CMR. Any major adverse cardiac event (MACE) or other serious adverse events in the first 24 h after MRI were recorded. There were 258 stents in 211 AMI patients. The mean delay to CMR following PCI was 6.5 ± 4 days, with 62 patients (29 %) receiving CMR within 3 days and 132 patients (63 %) within 1 week. Patients showed no significant vital sign changes following CMR. Ten patients (4.7 %) showed mild, transient ECG changes. Within the 24-h follow-up group, 4 patients (1.9 %) had moderate to severe events, including chest pain (1) and elevated cardiac enzymes (1), resolving in 24 h; heart failure (1) and ischemic stroke (1). There were no deaths. This study demonstrates fewer MACE in AMI patients undergoing 1.5 T CMR within 16 days of stent placement in comparison to post-stent event rate reported in the literature. This study adds to the CMR after stent PCI safety profile suggested by previous studies and is the largest and first study that uses multicenter data to assess stent safety following CMR examination.
Similar articles
-
The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Dec;33(6):360-6. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12160. Cardiovasc Ther. 2015. PMID: 26363283 Review.
-
Biomarker release after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients without established myocardial infarction as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul;90(1):87-93. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27125. Epub 2017 Jun 2. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28573785
-
Risk of Post-TKA Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With a History of Myocardial Infarction or Coronary Stent.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):479-86. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4616-z. Epub 2015 Nov 13. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 26566978 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced CMR early after acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a regional STEMI network: results of the "Herzinfarktverbund Essen".Herz. 2008 Mar;33(2):136-42. doi: 10.1007/s00059-008-3102-8. Herz. 2008. PMID: 18344033
-
Drug eluting versus bare metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein graft lesions: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Oct-Nov;19(7 Pt B):837-844. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 Apr 3. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018. PMID: 29685385
Cited by
-
Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Apr;30(4):683-95. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0405-0. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014. PMID: 24687406 Review. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous