Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;53(5):1329-41.
doi: 10.1007/s10943-013-9724-z.

Religiousness and religious coping in a secular society: the gender perspective

Affiliations

Religiousness and religious coping in a secular society: the gender perspective

Dorte Hvidtjørn et al. J Relig Health. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Women are found to be more religious than men and more likely to use religious coping. Only few studies have explored religious gender differences in more secular societies. This population-based study comprised 3,000 Danish men and women (response rate 45 %) between 20 and 40 years of age. Information about demographics, religiousness and religious coping was obtained through a web-based questionnaire. We organized religiousness in the three dimensions: Cognition, Practice and Importance, and we assessed religious coping using the brief RCOPE questionnaire. We found substantial gender differences in both religiousness and religious coping. Nearly, 60 % of the women believed in some sort of spirit or in God compared to 40 % of the men. Generally, both men and women scored low on the RCOPE scale. However, for respondents reporting high levels of religiousness, the proportion of men who scored high in the RCOPE exceeded the proportion of women in using positive and especially negative coping strategies. Also, in a secular society, women are found to be more religious than men, but in a subset of the most religious respondents, men were more inclined to use religious coping. Further studies on religious coping in secular societies are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Use of positive or negative religious coping associated with levels of belief in God. 1 Do not believe in God or in some sort of spirit, 2 do not know/in doubt, 3 believe in some sort of spirit but not in God, 4 believe in God, 5 know God really exists
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Use of positive or negative religious coping associated with frequency of prayer to God. 1 Never, 2 once a year or less, 3 monthly, 4 weekly, 5 daily
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Use of positive or negative religious coping associated with levels of importance of God. From (1) not important to (5) very important

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ausker N. Danske patienter intensiverer eksistentielle tanker og religiøst liv. Ugeskrift for Læger. 2008;170(21):1828–1833. - PubMed
    1. Bjorck JP, Thurman JW. Negative life events, patterns of positive and negative religious coping, and psychological functioning. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2007;46(2):159–167.
    1. Christensen K, Petersen I, Skytthe A, Herskind AM, McGue M, Bingley P. Comparison of academic performance of twins and singletons in adolescence: Follow-up study. BMJ. 2006;333(7578):1095. doi:10.1136/bmj.38959.650903.7C. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cotton S, Puchalski CM, Sherman SN, Mrus JM, Peterman AH, Feinberg J, et al. Spirituality and religion in patients with HIV/AIDS spirituality and religion in patients with HIV/AIDS. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006;21:S5–S13. doi:10.1111/j.1535-1497.2006.00642.x. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flannelly KJ, Galek K. Religion, evolution, and mental health: Attachment theory and ETAS theory. Journal of Religion and Health. 2010;49(3):337–350. doi:10.1007/s10943-009-9247-9. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources