Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;9(1):3-6.
doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.107121.

Long-term experience on laparoscopic incontinent urinary diversion unrelated to cystectomy in radiated or recurrent pelvic malignancies

Marcos Tobias-Machado  1 , Leonardo S Lopes, Felipe Brandao Correa de Araujo, Eduardo S Starling, Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo
Affiliations

Long-term experience on laparoscopic incontinent urinary diversion unrelated to cystectomy in radiated or recurrent pelvic malignancies

Marcos Tobias-Machado et al. J Minim Access Surg. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: There are few reports describing series of cases about development on laparoscopic urinary diversions no related to cystectomy. The aim of this paper is to show the experience of our reference institutions for treatment of pelvic malignancies when laparoscopic techniques were applied to perform only urinary diversion without cystectomy or pelvic exenteration.

Materials and methods: We included retrospectively 12 cases of cutaneous ureterostomy and 21 cases with a reservoir (16 ileal conduits, 2 colonic conduits and 3 wet colostomies) treated in our institute from 2004 to 2010. It was evaluated operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, conversion rate, length of large incision, post operative complications, analgesic consumption, time to food intake, hospital stay, time to recovery to normal activities. Mean time to follow-up was 3(2-7) years.

Results: All procedures were completed without conversions. In the cutaneous ureterostomy group the mean surgical time.

Keywords: Laparoscopic; pelvic malignancies; urinary Diversion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Martinez A, Filleron T, Vitse L, Querleu D, Mery E, Balague G, et al. Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy: Is there any advantage? Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:374–9. - PubMed
    1. Schneider A, Kohler C, Erdemoglu E. Current developments for pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21:4–9. - PubMed
    1. Boustead GB, Feneley MR. Pelvic exenterative surgery for palliation of malignant disease in the robotic era. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2010;22:740–6. - PubMed
    1. Tobias-Machado M, Starling ES, Korkes F, da Silva MN, Appolonio PR, Wroclawski ER. Video-assisted colonic conduit: A new minimally invasive urinary diversion to patients after pelvic radiotherapy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:e119–22. - PubMed
    1. Tobias-Machado M, Bicudo MC, Appolonio PR, Korkes F, Starling ES, Pompeu AC, et al. Video-assisted double-barreled wet colostomy: A new minimally invasive simultaneous diversion to patients after pelvic radiation therapy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19:803–6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources