Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 1;9(1):45-64.
doi: 10.1007/s11292-012-9169-5.

Psychosocial Functioning Among Inmates in Prison-Based Drug Treatment: Results from Project BRITE

William M Burdon  1 , Jef St De Lore, Jeff Dang, Umma S Warda, Michael L Prendergast
Affiliations

Psychosocial Functioning Among Inmates in Prison-Based Drug Treatment: Results from Project BRITE

William M Burdon et al. J Exp Criminol. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of a positive behavioral reinforcement intervention on psychosocial functioning of inmates over the course of treatment and on post-treatment self-reported measures of treatment participation, progress, and satisfaction.

Method: Male (n = 187) and female (n = 143) inmates participating in 12-week prison-based Intensive Outpatient (IOP) drug treatment were randomly assigned to receive standard treatment (ST) or standard treatment plus positive behavioral reinforcement (BR) for engaging in targeted activities and behaviors. Participants were assessed for psychosocial functioning at baseline and at the conclusion of treatment (post-treatment). Self-reported measures of treatment participation, treatment progress, and treatment satisfaction were also captured at post-treatment.

Results: The intervention affected female and male subjects differently and not always in a way that favored BR subjects, as compared to the ST subjects, most notably on measures of depression and criminal thinking.

Conclusions: Possible explanations for the results include differences in the male and female custody environments combined with the procedures that study participants had to follow to earn and/or receive positive reinforcement at the two study sites, as well as baseline differences between the genders and a possible floor effect among females on measures of criminality. Limitations of the study included the inability to make study participants blind to the study conditions and the possible over-branding of the study, which may have influenced the results.

Keywords: Behavioral Reinforcement; Prisoners; Psychosocial Functioning; Substance Abuse; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Project BRITE: Participant Flow Diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bandura A. Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1969.
    1. Burdon WM, St De Lore J, Prendergast ML. Developing and implementing a positive behavioral reinforcement intervention in prison-based drug treatment setting. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2011;43(S1):40–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chatham LR, Hiller ML, Rowan-Szal GA, Joe GW, Simpson DD. Gender differences at admission and follow-up in a sample of methadone maintenance clients. Substance Use & Misuse. 1999;34(8):1137–1165. - PubMed
    1. Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine. 1983;13:595–605. - PubMed
    1. Dutra L, Stathopoulou G, Basden SL, Leyro TM, Powers MB, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2008;165(2):179–187. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources