Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 23;8(4):e61842.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061842. Print 2013.

The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice

Brock Bastian  1 , Thomas F Denson, Nick Haslam
Affiliations

The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice

Brock Bastian et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

When innocents are intentionally harmed, people are motivated to see that offenders get their "just deserts". The severity of the punishment they seek is driven by the perceived magnitude of the harm and moral outrage. The present research extended this model of retributive justice by incorporating the role of offender dehumanization. In three experiments relying on survey methodology in Australia and the United States, participants read about different crimes that varied by type (child molestation, violent, or white collar - Studies 1 and 2) or severity (Study 3). The findings demonstrated that both moral outrage and dehumanization predicted punishment independently of the effects of crime type or crime severity. Both moral outrage and dehumanization mediated the relationship between perceived harm and severity of punishment. These findings highlight the role of offender dehumanization in punishment decisions and extend our understanding of processes implicated in retributive justice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors would like to state that the second author, TD, is an Academic Editor for PLOS ONE. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all of the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean differences in moral emotions and perceived humanness across crime types, Study 1.
Note: Values with different superscripts are significantly (p<.05) different from each other controlling for familywise error (Scheffé’s test).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean differences in moral emotions and humanness across crime types, Study 2.
Note: Values with different superscripts are significantly (p<.05) different from each other controlling for familywise error (Scheffé’s test).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Australian Associated Press (2006) Electric shock case: paedophile guilty of manslaughter. The Sydney Morning Herald.
    1. Evers N (2006) Paedophiles deserve the death penalty. Tasmanian Times.
    1. Ashworth A (2010) Sentencing and criminal justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Dane FC (1992) Applying social psychology in the courtroom: Understanding stereotypes in jury decision making. Contemporary Social Psychology 16: 33–36.
    1. Efran MG (1974) The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality 8: 45–54.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources