Breast reconstruction modality outcome study: a comparison of expander/implants and free flaps in select patients
- PMID: 23629074
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865977
Breast reconstruction modality outcome study: a comparison of expander/implants and free flaps in select patients
Abstract
Background: Choosing a breast reconstructive modality after mastectomy is a critical step involving complex decisions. The authors provide outcomes data comparing two common reconstructive modalities to assist patients and surgeons in preoperative counseling and discussions.
Methods: A prospectively maintained database was queried identifying select patients undergoing expander/implant and abdominally based free flaps for breast reconstruction between 2005 and 2008. Variables evaluated included comorbidities, operations, time to reconstruction, complications, overall outcome, clinic visits, revisions, and costs.
Results: One hundred forty-two patients received free flaps and 60 received expander/implants. Expander/implant patients required more procedures (p < 0.001) but had shorter overall hospital lengths of stay (p < 0.001). The two cohorts experienced a similar rate of revision (p = 0.17). Free flap patients elected to undergo nipple-areola reconstruction more frequently (p = 0.01) and were able to sooner (p < 0.0001). Patients undergoing expander/implant reconstruction had a higher rate of failure (7.3 versus 1.3 percent, p = 0.008). Free flap patients achieved a stable reconstruction significantly faster (p = 0.0005), with fewer visits (p = 0.02). Cost analysis demonstrated total cost trended toward significantly lower in the free flap cohort (p = 0.15). Reconstructive modality was the only independent factor associated with time to stable reconstruction and reconstructive failure (p < 0.001 and p = 0.05, respectively).
Conclusions: The authors' analysis revealed that free flap reconstructions required fewer procedures, had lower rates of complications and failures, had fewer clinic visits, and achieved a final, complete reconstruction faster than expander/implant reconstructions. Although autologous reconstruction is still not ideal for every patient, these findings can be used to enhance preoperative discussions when choosing a reconstructive modality.
Clinical question/level of evidence: : Therapeutic, III.
Comment in
-
Discussion: breast reconstruction modality outcome study: a comparison of expander/implants and free flaps in select patients.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):935-937. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318286598f. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23629075 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Propensity-matched, longitudinal outcomes analysis of complications and cost: comparing abdominal free flaps and implant-based breast reconstruction.J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Aug;219(2):303-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.028. Epub 2014 Apr 8. J Am Coll Surg. 2014. PMID: 24916480
-
Trends in Physician Payments for Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Apr;141(4):493e-499e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004205. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. PMID: 29595721 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jun;139(6):1300-1310. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003340. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. PMID: 28538548
-
Combining Abdominal Flaps and Implants in the Breast Reconstruction Patient: A Systematic and Retrospective Review of Complications and Outcomes.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar;143(3):495e-503e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005373. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 30589827
-
Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Dec;37(6):1194-201. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0213-2. Epub 2013 Oct 3. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 24091489 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2127806. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27806. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34596671 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Chest Feminization in Male-to-Female Transgender Patients: A Review of Options.Transgend Health. 2021 Oct 4;6(5):244-255. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2020.0057. eCollection 2021 Oct. Transgend Health. 2021. PMID: 34993297 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Implant-based versus Autologous Reconstruction after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 11;10(3):e4180. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004180. eCollection 2022 Mar. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022. PMID: 35291333 Free PMC article.
-
Elective Revisions after Breast Reconstruction: Results from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Dec;144(6):1280-1290. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006225. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 31764633 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive breast reconstruction in an academic surgical practice: an evaluation of the financial impact.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Dec;134(6):1131-1139. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000757. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014. PMID: 25415083 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andrade WN, Baxter N, Semple JL. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:46–54
-
- Roberts C, Wells KE, Daniels S. Outcome study of the psychological changes after silicone breast implant removal. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:595–599
-
- Guyomard V, Leinster S, Wilkinson M. Systematic review of studies of patients’ satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Breast. 2007;16:547–567
-
- Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality?. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118:623–633
-
- Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, Wilkins EG. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:7–12
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials