Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 15:80:527-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.083. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

Clinical applications of the functional connectome

Affiliations

Clinical applications of the functional connectome

F Xavier Castellanos et al. Neuroimage. .

Abstract

Central to the development of clinical applications of functional connectomics for neurology and psychiatry is the discovery and validation of biomarkers. Resting state fMRI (R-fMRI) is emerging as a mainstream approach for imaging-based biomarker identification, detecting variations in the functional connectome that can be attributed to clinical variables (e.g., diagnostic status). Despite growing enthusiasm, many challenges remain. Here, we assess evidence of the readiness of R-fMRI based functional connectomics to lead to clinically meaningful biomarker identification through the lens of the criteria used to evaluate clinical tests (i.e., validity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and applicability). We focus on current R-fMRI-based prediction efforts, and survey R-fMRI used for neurosurgical planning. We identify gaps and needs for R-fMRI-based biomarker identification, highlighting the potential of emerging conceptual, analytical and cultural innovations (e.g., the Research Domain Criteria Project (RDoC), open science initiatives, and Big Data) to address them. Additionally, we note the need to expand future efforts beyond identification of biomarkers for disease status alone to include clinical variables related to risk, expected treatment response and prognosis.

Keywords: Functional connectome; Predictive modeling; Reliability; Sensitivity; Specificity; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for between-group differences with a range of large effect sizes.

References

    1. ADHD Consortium. The ADHD-200 Consortium: a model to advance the translational potential of neuroimaging in clinical neuroscience. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2012;6:62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albert NB, Robertson EM, Miall RC. The resting human brain and motor learning. Curr. Biol. 2009;19:1023–1027. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ. 1994;309:102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson JS, Nielsen JA, Froehlich AL, Dubray MB, Druzgal TJ, Cariello AN, Cooperrider JR, Zielinski BA, Ravichandran C, Fletcher PT, Alexander AL, Bigler ED, Lange N, Lainhart JE. Functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging classification of autism. Brain. 2011;134:3742–3754. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrews-Hanna JR. The brain’s default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation. Neuroscientist. 2012;18:251–270. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types