Tobacco Industry Influence on the American Law Institute's Restatements of Torts and Implications for Its Conflict of Interest Policies
- PMID: 23633723
- PMCID: PMC3637975
Tobacco Industry Influence on the American Law Institute's Restatements of Torts and Implications for Its Conflict of Interest Policies
Abstract
The American Law Institute ("ALI") is a prestigious and influential organization that creates treatises on the current state of the law, including "Restatements" of case law that guide judicial decisions and legislation. This paper uses previously secret tobacco industry documents made available as the result of state and federal litigation against the industry to describe how the tobacco companies, acting both indirectly through their trade organization, the Tobacco Institute, and directly, using influential lawyers, quietly influenced the ALI's writing of the Restatements. The tobacco industry's ease of access to the ALI calls into question the Institute's independence, the preparation of major policy documents such as the Restatements, as well as the Institute's ability to monitor and control conflicts of interest. The ALI's conflict of interest policies lag behind comparable organizations such as the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine, and are insufficient to protect Institute projects from significant outside influence. Because of the undisclosed influence of the tobacco industry over the ALI, courts and legislatures should not apply the principles embodied in the Restatements in tort cases against the tobacco companies for injuries suffered from tobacco use. Until the ALI implements strong conflict of interest policies to ensure independence from private-interest manipulation, courts and legislatures should not rely on Institute reports and recommendations as neutral scholarly summaries of the law that should guide judicial and legislative decision-making.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The tobacco industry's tort reform campaign to avoid liability in Louisiana.Addict Behav. 2022 Feb;125:107147. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107147. Epub 2021 Oct 11. Addict Behav. 2022. PMID: 34715490
-
Manufacturing credibility: the National Energy Management Institute and the Tobacco Institute's strategy for indoor air quality.Am J Public Health. 2011 Mar;101(3):497-503. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.199695. Epub 2011 Jan 13. Am J Public Health. 2011. PMID: 21233427 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco industry use of judicial seminars to influence rulings in products liability litigation.Tob Control. 2006 Apr;15(2):120-4. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013128. Tob Control. 2006. PMID: 16565460 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s.Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):124-34. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.124. Tob Control. 2001. PMID: 11387532 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco industry lawyers as "disease vectors".Tob Control. 2007 Aug;16(4):224-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.018390. Tob Control. 2007. PMID: 17652236 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Tobacco industry attempts to frame smoking as a 'disability' under the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act.PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188188. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 29176829 Free PMC article.
References
-
-
Green v. Am. Tobacco Co., 391 F.2d 97, 99 (5th Cir. 1968), rev’d per curiam, 409 F.2d 1166 (5th Cir. 1969) (en banc), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 911 (1970).
-
-
-
Id.
-
-
-
See id. at 99-101.
-
-
-
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965). See generally id. §§ 281-503.
-
-
-
Green, 391 F.2d at 110.
-
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources