Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;9(1):e13-6.
doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000666.

Reducing clinical trial monitoring resource allocation and costs through remote access to electronic medical records

Affiliations

Reducing clinical trial monitoring resource allocation and costs through remote access to electronic medical records

Shannon C Uren et al. J Oncol Pract. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: With electronic medical records (eMRs), the option now exists for clinical trial monitors to perform source data verification (SDV) remotely. We report on a feasibility study of remote access to eMRs for SDV and the potential advantages of such a process in terms of resource allocation and cost.

Methods: The Clinical Trials Unit at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, in collaboration with Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia, conducted a 6-month feasibility study of remote SDV. A Novartis monitor was granted dedicated software and restricted remote access to the eMR portal of the cancer center, thereby providing an avenue through which perform SDV.

Results: Six monitoring visits were conducted during the study period, four of which were performed remotely. The ability to conduct two thirds of the monitoring visits remotely in this complex phase III study resulted in an overall cost saving to Novartis. Similarly, remote monitoring eased the strain on internal resources, particularly monitoring space and hospital computer terminal access, at the cancer center.

Conclusion: Remote access to patient eMRs for SDV is feasible and is potentially an avenue through which resources can be more efficiently used. Although this feasibility study involved limited numbers, there is no limit to scaling these processes to any number of patients enrolled onto large clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. European Medicines Agency. ICH Topic E 6 (R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice, July 2002. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guidelin....
    1. Duley L, Antman K, Arena J, et al. Specific barriers to the conduct of randomized trials. Clin Trials. 2008;5:40–48. - PubMed
    1. Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, et al. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3:1–143. - PubMed
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Oversight of Clinical Investigations: A Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring, August 2011. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformati....
    1. Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. https://www.trialstransformation.org.