Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:953897.
doi: 10.1155/2013/953897. Epub 2013 Mar 24.

Acute lumbar burst fracture treated by minimally invasive lateral corpectomy

Affiliations

Acute lumbar burst fracture treated by minimally invasive lateral corpectomy

Rodrigo Amaral et al. Case Rep Orthop. 2013.

Abstract

Burst fractures in acute spinal traumas are a difficult problem to solve. Different approaches and techniques have been utilized, but with high incidence of morbidity and mortality, besides unsatisfactory clinical and radiological results. Mini-open approaches recently emerged and have been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of several spinal conditions. Here we report a case of acute lumbar burst fracture at L2 treated by minimally invasive true lateral approach posteriorly instrumented with percutaneous pedicle screws. The minimum disruptive access in addition to a rigid construction allowed a lumbar corpectomy without the morbidity of standard open approaches, lowering surgery costs and accelerating the patient recovery with successfully clinical and radiological results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
X-ray and CT scan showing a burst fracture on L2 vertebra with a fragment inside the spinal canal.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intraoperative fluoroscopy and immediate postoperative X-ray showing implant position and fracture reduction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
AP and lateral X-rays showing good coronal and sagittal alignments 12 months after surgery.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CT scan showing solid fusion 24 months after the procedure. The device design promotes the ossification inside and outside of the prosthesis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith WD, Dakwar E, Le TV, Christian G, Serrano S, Uribe JS. Minimally invasive surgery for traumatic spinal pathologies: a mini-open, lateral approach in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine. 2010;35, supplement:S338–S346. - PubMed
    1. Sasso RC, Cotler HB. Posterior instrumentation and fusion for unstable fractures and fracture- dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a comparative study of three fixation devices in 70 patients. Spine. 1993;18(4):450–460. - PubMed
    1. Dai LY. Remodeling of the spinal canal after thoracolumbar burst fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2001;(382):119–123. - PubMed
    1. Verlaan JJ, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E, et al. Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome. Spine. 2004;29(7):803–814. - PubMed
    1. Dimar JR, Fisher C, Vaccaro AR, et al. Predictors of complications after spinal stabilization of thoracolumbar spine injuries. Journal of Trauma. 2010;69(6):1497–1500. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources