Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Mar;121(3):561-569.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182822193.

Timing of delivery and adverse outcomes in term singleton repeat cesarean deliveries

Giuseppe Chiossi  1 , Yinglei Lai, Mark B Landon, Catherine Y Spong, Dwight J Rouse, Michael W Varner, Steve N Caritis, Yoram Sorokin, Mary J O'Sullivan, Baha M Sibai, John M Thorp, Susan M Ramin, Brian M Mercer; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network*
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Timing of delivery and adverse outcomes in term singleton repeat cesarean deliveries

Giuseppe Chiossi et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the maternal and neonatal risks of elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with pregnancy continuation at different gestational ages, starting from 37 weeks.

Methods: We analyzed the composite maternal and neonatal outcomes of repeat cesarean deliveries studied prospectively over 4 years at 19 U.S. centers. Maternal outcome was a composite of pulmonary edema, cesarean hysterectomy, pelvic abscess, thromboembolism, pneumonia, transfusion, or death. Composite neonatal outcome consisted of respiratory distress, transient tachypnea, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, ventilation, seizure, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, neonatal intensive care unit admission, 5-minute Apgar of 3 or lower, or death. Outcomes after elective repeat cesarean delivery without labor at each specific gestational age were compared with outcomes for all who were delivered later as a result of labor onset, specific obstetric indications, or both.

Results: Twenty-three thousand seven hundred ninety-four repeat cesarean deliveries were included. Elective delivery at 37 weeks of gestation had significantly higher risks of adverse maternal outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.31), whereas elective delivery at 39 weeks of gestation was associated with better maternal outcome when compared with pregnancy continuation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.72). Elective repeat cesarean deliveries at 37 and 38 weeks of gestation had significantly higher risks of adverse neonatal outcome (37 weeks OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.73-2.36; 38 weeks OR 1.39 95% CI 1.24-1.56), whereas delivery at 39 and 40 weeks of gestation presented better neonatal outcome as opposed to pregnancy continuation (39 weeks OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.92; 40 weeks OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.75).

Conclusion: In women with prior cesarean delivery, 39 weeks of gestation is the optimal time for repeat cesarean delivery for both mother and neonate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure

The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients included in this secondary analysis of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) cesarean registry.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Composite maternal outcome for delivery compared with expectant management. Rate is expressed as percentage of women with adverse outcomes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Composite neonatal outcome for delivery compared with expectant management. Rate is expressed as percentage of neonates with adverse outcomes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, Solda G, Salvadori A, Trevisanuto D. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93:643–7. - PubMed
    1. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:150. - PubMed
    1. Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY, Lai Y, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:111–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spong CY, Mercer BM, D’alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:323–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salim R, Shalev E. Health implications resulting from the timing of elective cesarean delivery. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;21;8:68. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding