Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;19(6):299-302.
doi: 10.1159/000348426. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

Attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli among belief based and non-belief based non-drinkers

Affiliations

Attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli among belief based and non-belief based non-drinkers

A C Moss et al. Eur Addict Res. 2013.

Abstract

Background/aims: Research has provided evidence for an association between attentional biases for substance-related stimuli and the development and maintenance of a variety of addictive behaviours. Attempts at reducing attentional bias amongst harmful and dependent drinkers have provided evidence to suggest that reduced attentional bias in heavy drinkers would lead to necessary reductions in alcohol intake. We tested one aspect of this assumption by measuring attentional bias amongst non-drinkers who, if the link between attentional bias and actual drug use is causal, should demonstrate no attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli.

Methods: An alcohol Stroop task was administered to belief-based abstainers, non-belief based abstainers and light social drinkers to measure attentional biases for alcohol-related words compared to neutral words.

Results: Belief-based abstainers demonstrated significant attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli, whilst non-belief based abstainers and light social drinkers did not.

Conclusion: Attentional biases towards alcohol-related stimuli are not specific to harmful and problem drinkers, which has implications for interventions based on attentional bias change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • A logical fallacy: commentary on Moss et al.
    Field M. Field M. Eur Addict Res. 2013;19(6):303-4. doi: 10.1159/000348427. Epub 2013 May 3. Eur Addict Res. 2013. PMID: 23652212 No abstract available.
  • Commentary on Moss et al.
    Franken IH. Franken IH. Eur Addict Res. 2013;19(6):305-6. doi: 10.1159/000348430. Epub 2013 May 3. Eur Addict Res. 2013. PMID: 23652318 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources