Variation in ovarian conservation in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications
- PMID: 23635670
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182887a47
Variation in ovarian conservation in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications
Abstract
Objective: Emerging data suggest that oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign indications may increase long-term morbidity and mortality. We performed a population-based analysis to estimate the rates of oophorectomy in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications.
Methods: The Perspective database was used to estimate the rate of ovarian preservation in women aged 40-64 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications. Hierarchical mixed-effects regression models were developed to estimate the influence of patient, procedural, physician, and hospital characteristics on ovarian conservation. Between-hospital variation in ovarian preservation also was estimated.
Results: Among 752,045 women, 348,972 (46.4%) underwent bilateral oophorectomy, whereas 403,073 (53.6%) had ovarian conservation. Stratified by age, the rate of ovarian conservation was 74.3% for those younger than 40 years of age; 62.7% for those 40-44 years of age; 40.8% for those 45-49 years of age; 25.2% for those 50-54 years of age; 25.5% for those 55-59 years of age; and 31.0% for those 60-64 years of age. Younger age and more recent year of surgery had the strongest association with ovarian conservation. The observed patient, procedural, physician, and hospital characteristics accounted for only 46% of the total variation in the rate of ovarian conservation; 54% of the variability remained unexplained, suggesting a large amount of intrinsic between-hospital variation in the decision to perform oophorectomy.
Conclusion: The rate of ovarian conservation is increasing, particularly among women younger than 50 years old. Although demographic and clinical factors influence the decision to perform oophorectomy, there appears to be substantial between-hospital variation in performance of oophorectomy that remains unexplained by measurable patient, physician, or hospital characteristics.
Level of evidence: II.
Comment in
-
Ovaries, estrogen, and longevity.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):701-702. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828af732. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23635666 No abstract available.
-
Ovaries, estrogen, and longevity and long-term mortality associated with oophorectomy compared with ovarian conservation in the Nurses' Health Study and variation in ovarian conservation in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):397-398. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829e3325. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23969821 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy and all-cause and cause-specific mortality.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):723.e1-723.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32376318
-
Trends in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy among Taiwanese women undergoing benign hysterectomy: a population-based, pooled, cross-sectional study.Menopause. 2015 Jul;22(7):765-72. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000360. Menopause. 2015. PMID: 25387346
-
Removal of normal ovaries in women under age 51 at the time of hysterectomy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):716.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.062. Epub 2015 May 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26032038
-
Should the ovaries be removed or retained at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease?Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):131-41. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp037. Epub 2009 Sep 30. Hum Reprod Update. 2010. PMID: 19793841 Review.
-
Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;50(2):354-61. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804a838d. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17513923 Review.
Cited by
-
Association of infertility with type and timing of menopause: a prospective cohort study.Hum Reprod. 2023 Sep 5;38(9):1843-1852. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead143. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 37451681 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns of utilization and outcome of ovarian conservation for young women with minimal-risk endometrial cancer.Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;154(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.653. Epub 2019 Apr 26. Gynecol Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31036348 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation: a cohort study.Menopause. 2018 May;25(5):483-492. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001043. Menopause. 2018. PMID: 29286988 Free PMC article.
-
Adnexal lesions after hysterectomy: A retrospective observational study.J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2019 Aug 28;20(3):165-169. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0051. Epub 2018 Jul 31. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2019. PMID: 30063215 Free PMC article.
-
Utilization and Outcomes of Ovarian Conservation in Premenopausal Women With Endometrial Cancer.Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):101-108. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001181. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26646128 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jacoby VL, Vittinghoff E, Nakagawa S, Jackson R, Richter HE, Chan J, et al.. Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:1259–67.
-
- Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1091–5.
-
- Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1041–8.
-
- Baloglu A, Bezircioglu I, Cetinkaya B, Karci L, Bicer M. Development of secondary ovarian lesions after hysterectomy without oophorectomy versus unilateral oophorectomy for benign conditions: a retrospective analysis of patients during a nine-year period of observation. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2010;37:299–302.
-
- Holub Z, Jandourek M, Jabor A, Kliment L, Wagnerova M. Does hysterectomy without salpingo-oophorectomy influence the reoperation rate for adnexal pathology? A retrospective study. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2000;27:109–12.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials