Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jul;10(7):1161-9.
doi: 10.4161/rna.24765. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

Approaches to querying bacterial genomes with transposon-insertion sequencing

Affiliations
Review

Approaches to querying bacterial genomes with transposon-insertion sequencing

Lars Barquist et al. RNA Biol. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

In this review, we discuss transposon-insertion sequencing, variously known in the literature as TraDIS, Tn-seq, INSeq, and HITS. By monitoring a large library of single transposon-insertion mutants with high-throughput sequencing, these methods can rapidly identify genomic regions that contribute to organismal fitness under any condition assayable in the laboratory with exquisite resolution. We discuss the various protocols that have been developed and methods for analysis. We provide an overview of studies that have examined the reproducibility and accuracy of these methods, as well as studies showing the advantages offered by the high resolution and dynamic range of high-throughput sequencing over previous methods. We review a number of applications in the literature, from predicting genes essential for in vitro growth to directly assaying requirements for survival under infective conditions in vivo. We also highlight recent progress in assaying non-coding regions of the genome in addition to known coding sequences, including the combining of RNA-seq with high-throughput transposon mutagenesis.

Keywords: bacteria; essential genes; sRNA; sequencing; systems biology; transposon mutagenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. An illustration of the workflow typical of transposon-insertion sequencing protocols. Transposons are represented by pink lines, sequencing adaptors by blue, genomic DNA by black and PCR primers by green. Mutants are generated through either in vivo or in vitro transposition and subsequent selection for antibiotic resistance. These mutants are pooled, and optionally competed in test conditions, then genomic DNA is extracted and fragmented by restriction digest or physical shearing. Sequencing adaptors are ligated, some protocols then perform a step to purify fragments containing transposon insertions, and PCR with transposon- and adaptor-specific primers is used to specifically enrich for transposon-containing fragments. The fragments are then sequenced and mapped back to a reference genome to uniquely identify insertion sites with nucleotide-resolution. Dashed boxes indicate steps which differ between protocols.
None
Figure 2. Applications of transposon-insertion sequencing to non-coding RNAs. (A) Plots of genomic regions in Mycobacterium tuberculosis containing the required non-coding RNAs RNase P (top) and tmRNA (bottom). Tracks, from top to bottom, 1. Histogram of insertion counts, 2. Comprehensive heat-map of requirement of 500-bp windows, 3. Position of annotated genes, 4. Position of TA dinucleotide sites, 5. Position of non-coding RNA. Reproduced from reference . (B) 1 × 1 competition assays validate attenuating Streptococcus pneumoniae sRNA mutants identified by transposon-insertion sequencing. Mice were infected with defined deletions of sRNAs identified as attenuating by Tn-seq and wild-type S. pneumoniae TIGR4 at the body site indicated and bacterial densities were compared 24 h post-infection. These plots show the derived competitive index in blood (top) and the nasopharnyx (bottom). Each point represents the result of a competition experiment between an sRNA deletion mutant and wild-type TIGR4. A competitive index of 1 indicates equivalent numbers of mutants and wild-type were recovered. Modified from reference .

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:0008. doi: 10.1038/msb4100050. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hobbs EC, Astarita JL, Storz G. Small RNAs and small proteins involved in resistance to cell envelope stress and acid shock in Escherichia coli: analysis of a bar-coded mutant collection. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:59–67. doi: 10.1128/JB.00873-09. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hensel M, Shea JE, Gleeson C, Jones MD, Dalton E, Holden DW. Simultaneous identification of bacterial virulence genes by negative selection. Science. 1995;269:400–3. doi: 10.1126/science.7618105. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mazurkiewicz P, Tang CM, Boone C, Holden DW. Signature-tagged mutagenesis: barcoding mutants for genome-wide screens. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:929–39. doi: 10.1038/nrg1984. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hutchison CA, Peterson SN, Gill SR, Cline RT, White O, Fraser CM, et al. Global transposon mutagenesis and a minimal Mycoplasma genome. Science. 1999;286:2165–9. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5447.2165. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources