Patient satisfaction after midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence
- PMID: 23635737
- PMCID: PMC4048751
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828ca49e
Patient satisfaction after midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence
Abstract
Objective: To identify factors that may contribute to patient satisfaction with outcome in women who received retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings.
Methods: Satisfaction was assessed 12 months postsurgery as a planned analysis in 597 participants from a multicenter randomized trial comparing retropubic with transobturator midurethral slings using the Incontinence Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire. Significantly related variables associated with satisfaction in univariable analyses were entered into multivariable logistic regression models to test their independent association with satisfaction.
Results: One year after surgery, 264 (88.6%) in the retropubic group and 263 (88.0%) in the transobturator group completed satisfaction questionnaires. Both treatment groups demonstrated a high level of satisfaction with respect to urine leakage (retropubic 85.9% compared with transobturator 90.0%; P=.52), urgency to urinate, frequency of urination, capability of physical activity, social activity, ability to engage in sexual activity, and from an emotional standpoint. Baseline characteristics associated with reduced satisfaction were higher Medical, Epidemiologic, and Social Aspects of Aging Questionnaire urgency subscale scores, detrusor overactivity, and diabetes mellitus. The severity of both objective (frequency of incontinence episodes, pad test weight) and subjective (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and Urogenital Distress Inventory score) measures of incontinence at baseline and the patients' perceptions of preoperative severity of incontinence and expectations of achieving postoperative cure or improvement were not statistically different between satisfied and unsatisfied patients. In the final multivariable model, satisfaction was associated with overall treatment success (odds ratio [OR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-5.13], greater reduction in Urogenital Distress Inventory (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.98) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire scores (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99), and fewer complications (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-0.99).
Conclusion: The high level of satisfaction seen after midurethral sling procedures is associated with greater objective and patient-perceived improvement of stress incontinence and fewer complications.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00325039.
Level of evidence: II.
Similar articles
-
Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2066-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912658. Epub 2010 May 17. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20479459 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Characteristics Associated With Treatment Failure 1 Year After Midurethral Sling in Women With Mixed Urinary Incontinence.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):482-491. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003989. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. Retraction in: Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):312. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004470. PMID: 32769647 Free PMC article. Retracted. Clinical Trial.
-
Five-year results of a randomized trial comparing retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.031. Epub 2014 Jan 31. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24508070 Clinical Trial.
-
Female Sexual Function Following Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sex Med Rev. 2018 Apr;6(2):224-233. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Dec 28. Sex Med Rev. 2018. PMID: 29289535
-
Patient satisfaction following midurethral sling surgeries.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;26(5):404-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000097. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25101827 Review.
Cited by
-
Transobturator midurethral sling: What should patients expect after surgery?Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):55-61. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3408-2. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 28689238 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of preoperative flow rate on postoperative retention and voiding difficulty after transobturator tape operation.Korean J Urol. 2014 Mar;55(3):190-5. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.3.190. Epub 2014 Mar 13. Korean J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24648874 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life and sexual function after tension-free vaginal tape and polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for primary stress urinary incontinence: 3-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Dec;34(12):2977-2984. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05626-x. Epub 2023 Sep 6. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 37672047 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Analysis of voiding dysfunction after transobturator tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence.Korean J Urol. 2015 Dec;56(12):823-30. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.12.823. Epub 2015 Dec 10. Korean J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26682023 Free PMC article.
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Consent for Patients Undergoing Transobturator Slings.Urogynecology (Phila). 2025 Jul 1;31(7):705-712. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001543. Epub 2024 Jul 5. Urogynecology (Phila). 2025. PMID: 38990756 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Mallett VT, Brubaker L, Stoddard AM, Borello-France D, Tennstedt S, Hall L, Hammontree L. Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. The expectations of patients who undergo surgery for stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:308, e1–6. - PubMed
-
- Goode PS, Burgio KL, Kraus SR, Kenton K, Litman HJ, Richter HE, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network Correlates and predictors of patient satisfaction with drug therapy and combined drug therapy and behavioral training for urgency urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2011;22:327–34. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Lemack GE, Dandreo KJ, Varner RE, Menefee S, Ghetti C, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Khandwala S, Rozanski TA, Johnson H, Schaffer J, Stoddard AM, Holley RL, Nager CW, Moalli P, Mueller E, Arisco AM, Corton M, Tennstedt S, Chang TD, Gormley EA, Litman HJ, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2066–76. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
- U01 DK58225,/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60393/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058234/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060393/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060380/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060397/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60380/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60395/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060401/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058229/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060395/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK58229/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60397/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK58231/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK060379/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60401/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK60379/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01DK58234/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058225/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK058231/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials