Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul;29(4):308-14.
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3182945243.

Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioner/community health worker care to reduce cardiovascular health disparities

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioner/community health worker care to reduce cardiovascular health disparities

Jerilyn K Allen et al. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Although evidence-based guidelines on the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes have been widely published, implementation of recommended therapies is suboptimal.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive program of CVD risk reduction delivered by nurse practitioner/community health worker (NP/CHW) teams versus enhanced usual care to improve lipids, blood pressure (BP), and hemoglobin (Hb) A1c levels in patients in urban community health centers.

Methods: A total of 525 patients with documented CVD, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, or hypertension and levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, BP, or Hb A1c that exceeded goals established by national guidelines were randomized to NP/CHW (n = 261) or enhanced usual care (n = 264) groups. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated, determining costs per percent and unit change in the primary outcomes.

Results: The mean incremental total cost per patient (NP/CHW and physician) was only $627 (confidence interval, 248-1015). The cost-effectiveness of the 1-year intervention was $157 for every 1% drop in systolic BP and $190 for every 1% drop in diastolic BP, $149 per 1% drop in Hb A1c, and $40 per 1% drop in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that management by an NP/CHW team is a cost-effective approach for community health centers to consider in improving the care of patients with existing CVD or at high risk for the development of CVD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
COACH Flow Diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of intervention time by task

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–e209. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, Epstein RS. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care. 2005;43:521–530. - PubMed
    1. Ho PM, Rumsfeld JS, Masoudi, et al. Effect of medication non-adherence on hospitalization and mortality among patients with diabetes mellitus. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006;166(17):1836–1841. - PubMed
    1. Muszbek N, Brixner D, Benedict A, Keskinaslan A, Khan Z. The economic consequences of noncompliance in cardiovascular disease and related conditions: a literature review. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(2):338–351. 2008. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen JK. Cholesterol management: an opportunity for nurse case managers. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2000;14(2):50–58. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms