Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb 12:1:e11.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.11. Print 2013.

Assessing insect responses to climate change: What are we testing for? Where should we be heading?

Affiliations

Assessing insect responses to climate change: What are we testing for? Where should we be heading?

Nigel R Andrew et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

To understand how researchers are tackling globally important issues, it is crucial to identify whether current research is comprehensive enough to make substantive predictions about general responses. We examined how research on climate change affecting insects is being assessed, what factors are being tested and the localities of studies, from 1703 papers published between 1985 and August 2012. Most published research (64%) is generated from Europe and North America and being dedicated to core data analysis, with 29% of the studies analysed dedicated to Lepidoptera and 22% Diptera: which are well above their contribution to the currently identified insect species richness (estimated at 13% and 17% respectively). Research publications on Coleoptera fall well short of their proportional contribution (19% of publications but 39% of insect species identified), and to a lesser extent so do Hemiptera, and Hymenoptera. Species specific responses to changes in temperature by assessing distribution/range shifts or changes in abundance were the most commonly used methods of assessing the impact of climate change on insects. Research on insects and climate change to date is dominated by manuscripts assessing butterflies in Europe, insects of economic and/or environmental concern in forestry, agriculture, and model organisms. The research on understanding how insects will respond to a rapidly changing climate is still in its infancy, but the current trends of publications give a good basis for how we are attempting to assess insect responses. In particular, there is a crucial need for broader studies of ecological, behavioural, physiological and life history responses to be addressed across a greater range of geographic locations, particularly Asia, Africa and Australasia, and in areas of high human population growth and habitat modification. It is still too early in our understanding of taxa responses to climate change to know if charismatic taxa, such as butterflies, or disease vectors, including Diptera, can be used as keystone taxa to generalise other insect responses to climate change. This is critical as the basic biology of most species is still poorly known, and dominant, well studied taxa may show variable responses to climate change across their distribution due to regional biotic and abiotic influences. Indeed identifying if insect responses to climate change can be generalised using phylogeny, functional traits, or functional groups, or will populations and species exhibit idiosyncratic responses, should be a key priority for future research.

Keywords: Climate modelling; Desktop study; Entomology; Published research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of publications assessing the impact of climate change on insects from 1985 to 2012. A star is shown for 2012 as it only includes papers up to August 2nd.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Proportion of published papers (n = 1703) and estimated number of species (Zboroski 2010; n = 898 730 species) within the top 18 orders studied. (b) Number of published papers in each of the top 18 order studies, and publication type. Data type based on Table 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of published studies assessing the impacts of climate change on the numerically top insect Orders (based on number of publications) from different global regions. Regions based on Table 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of publications addressing different climate change factors by (a) assemblage type; (b) publication type and (c) habitat type. Groupings based on Table 1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
How insect responses to climate change have been recorded in publications between 1985 and 2012. Four groups allocated (A–D) based on number of publications in each response group (Table 1).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Number of publications produced for each of the dominant Orders in different habitats. Habitats based on Table 1.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Publication type and insect response variable recorded in publications. Groupings based on Table 1.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Number of publications based on the top 10 ranked Orders (based on number of publications) and response variable of taxa studied by authors. Response variables based on Table 1.

Similar articles

  • Drivers and pressures behind insect decline in Central and Western Europe based on long-term monitoring data.
    Rumohr Q, Baden CU, Bergtold M, Marx MT, Oellers J, Schade M, Toschki A, Maus C. Rumohr Q, et al. PLoS One. 2023 Aug 23;18(8):e0289565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289565. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37611013 Free PMC article.
  • Extensive regional variation in the phenology of insects and their response to temperature across North America.
    Dunn PO, Ahmed I, Armstrong E, Barlow N, Barnard MA, Bélisle M, Benson TJ, Berzins LL, Boynton CK, Brown TA, Cady M, Cameron K, Chen X, Clark RG, Clotfelter ED, Cromwell K, Dawson RD, Denton E, Forbes A, Fowler K, Fraser KC, Gandhi KJK, Garant D, Hiebert M, Houchen C, Houtz J, Imlay TL, Inouye BD, Inouye DW, Jackson M, Jacobson AP, Jayd K, Juteau C, Kautz A, Killian C, Kinnear E, Komatsu KJ, Larsen K, Laughlin A, Levesque-Beaudin V, Leys R, Long E, Lougheed SC, Mackenzie S, Marangelo J, Miller C, Molano-Flores B, Morrissey CA, Nicholls E, Orlofske JM, Pearse IS, Pelletier F, Pitt AL, Poston JP, Racke DM, Randall JA, Richardson ML, Rooney O, Ruegg AR, Rush S, Ryan SJ, Sadowski M, Schoepf I, Schulz L, Shea B, Sheehan TN, Siefferman L, Sikes D, Stanback M, Styrsky JD, Taff CC, Uehling JJ, Uvino K, Wassmer T, Weglarz K, Weinberger M, Wenzel J, Whittingham LA. Dunn PO, et al. Ecology. 2023 May;104(5):e4036. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4036. Epub 2023 Apr 4. Ecology. 2023. PMID: 36944538
  • Bat responses to climate change: a systematic review.
    Festa F, Ancillotto L, Santini L, Pacifici M, Rocha R, Toshkova N, Amorim F, Benítez-López A, Domer A, Hamidović D, Kramer-Schadt S, Mathews F, Radchuk V, Rebelo H, Ruczynski I, Solem E, Tsoar A, Russo D, Razgour O. Festa F, et al. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Feb;98(1):19-33. doi: 10.1111/brv.12893. Epub 2022 Aug 21. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023. PMID: 36054527 Free PMC article.
  • [Forensic entomology and globalisation].
    Turchetto M, Vanin S. Turchetto M, et al. Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):187-90. Parassitologia. 2004. PMID: 15305714 Review. Italian.
  • Recent climate change is creating hotspots of butterfly increase and decline across North America.
    Crossley MS, Smith OM, Berry LL, Phillips-Cosio R, Glassberg J, Holman KM, Holmquest JG, Meier AR, Varriano SA, McClung MR, Moran MD, Snyder WE. Crossley MS, et al. Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Jun;27(12):2702-2714. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15582. Epub 2021 Mar 22. Glob Chang Biol. 2021. PMID: 33749964

Cited by

References

    1. Andrew NR. Population dynamics of insect populations: impacts of a changing climate. In: Rohde K, editor. The balance of nature and climate change. Cambridge University Press; 2013. pp. 311–324.
    1. Andrew NR, Hart RA, Terblanche JS. Limited plasticity of low temperature tolerance in an Australian cantharid beetle Chauliognathus lugubris. Physiological Entomology. 2011;36:385–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2011.00800.x. - DOI
    1. Andrew NR, Hughes L. Species diversity and structure of phytophagous beetle assemblages along a latitudinal gradient: predicting the potential impacts of climate change. Ecological Entomology. 2004;29:527–542. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00639.x. - DOI
    1. Andrew NR, Hughes L. Arthropod community structure along a latitudinal gradient: implications for future impacts of climate change. Austral Ecology. 2005;30:281–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01464.x. - DOI
    1. Andrewartha HG, Birch LC. The distribution and abundance of animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1954.

LinkOut - more resources