Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths
- PMID: 23638414
- PMCID: PMC3633751
- DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.02.08
Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths
Abstract
Aim: : To investigate the predictability of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using the IOLMaster and different IOL power calculation formulas in eyes with various axial length (AL).
Methods: : Patients were included who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in the Department of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China from February 2007 to January 2009. Preoperative AL and keratometric values (Ks) were measured by IOLMaster optical biometry. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on AL less than 22mm (Group 1), 22-26mm (Group 2), and more than 26mm (Group 3). The power of the implanted IOL was used to calculate the predicted postoperative spherical equivalence (SE) by various formulas: the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T. The predictive accuracy of each formula was analyzed by comparing the difference between the actual and predicted postoperative SE (MedAE, median absolute error). All the patients had follow-up periods exceeding 3 months.
Results: : Totally, there were 200 eyes (33 eyes in Group 1, 92 eyes in Group 2, 75 eyes in Group 3). In all patients, the Haigis had the significantly lower MedAE generated by the other formulas (P<0.05). In Group 1 to 3, the MedAE calculated by the Haigis was either significantly lower or comparable to those calculated by the other formulas.
Conclusion: : Compared with other formulas using IOLMaster biometric data, the Haigis formula yields superior refractive results in eyes with various AL.
Keywords: calculation formula; intraocular lens; optical biometry.
Similar articles
-
Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.017. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008. PMID: 18242451
-
[Comparison of the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas based on the new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry].Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 11;57(7):502-511. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200729-00511. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 34256470 Chinese.
-
Intraocular lens power calculation using IOLMaster and various formulas in short eyes.Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;25(3):151-5. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.3.151. Epub 2011 May 24. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 21655038 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long eyes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;46(7):738-749. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13184. Epub 2018 Mar 24. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29498180
-
Meta-analysis of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in short eyes.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 May;46(4):356-363. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13058. Epub 2017 Oct 10. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 28887901 Review.
Cited by
-
Refractive results of phacoemulsification in vitrectomized patients.Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;37(3):673-681. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0325-1. Epub 2016 Aug 25. Int Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 27561748
-
Performance of the SRK/T formula using A-Scan ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification in eyes with short and long axial lengths.BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul 8;16:96. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0271-8. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27391470 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Short Eyes.Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 29;52(3):201-207. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.83704. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35770345 Free PMC article.
-
Review of current status of refractive lens exchange and role of dysfunctional lens index as its new indication.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2797-2803. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2259_20. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 33229654 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of pupillary dilation on Haigis formula-calculated intraocular lens power measurement by using optical biometry.Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul 27;10:1405-10. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S109797. eCollection 2016. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27555746 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, Rainer G, Vass C, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):524–534. - PubMed
-
- Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18(2):125–129. - PubMed
-
- Findle O. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16(1):61–61. - PubMed
-
- Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S, Kiss B, Polak K, Nepp J, Schild G, Rainer G, Maca S, Petternel V, Lackner B, Drexler W. Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(10):1950–1955. - PubMed
-
- Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL. Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T, and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(1):63–71. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials